Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500050
Original file (ND1500050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

                  ex- SA , USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20141006
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:     
         Narrative Reason change to:     
        
Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20131021 - 20140408     Active: 

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20140409     Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20140428      Highest Rank/Rate: SA
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 20 Day(s)
Education Level:         AFQT: 51
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: NFIR

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends that he did not utilize deceit or trickery upon enlistment and should receive an Honorable discharge as well as a change in narrative reason.

Decision

Date: 20150115            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the Applicant’s pre-enlistment diagnoses of ADHD, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends that he did not utilize deceit or trickery upon enlistment and should receive an Honorable discharge as well as a change in narrative reason. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the recruiter misled him through the recruitment process. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. However, even if the Applicant could show misrepresentations in the recruitment process, such misrepresentations would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s own misconduct.

In accordance with MILPERSMAN 1910-134 (FRAUDULENT ENTRY), members may be separated for effecting a fraudulent enlistment, induction, or period of service by falsely representing or deliberately concealing any qualifications or disqualifications prescribed by law, regulation, or orders. On the Recommendation for Administrative Separation letter dated 20140411 and signed by a Clinical Psychologist, USS TRANQUILITY, Fleet medicine, it states that the Applicant “was treated for ADHD from approximately age 4 until he graduated high school in May 2013 at age 18. SR stated that he was prescribed the medication consistently for that time frame. The recruit further reported that he received special accommodations during his 9 th grade year in high school. SR stated that he informed his recruiter but not MEPS about his treatment history.” Although the record appears to show that the Applicant disclosed his prior medical condition during the Moment of Truth at boot camp, it does not excuse his neglect to fully disclose his medical history throughout the entirety of his enlistment process. Furthermore, when notified of administrative separation, the Applicant waived his right to submit matters of mitigation to the Separating Authority.

An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when separation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. Since the Applicant served only 20 days, an Uncharacterized discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service. A preponderance of the evidence reviewed supports the conclusion that the Applicant was a fraudulent enlistee, that separation from the Naval Service was appropriate, and that an Uncharacterized (Entry Level Separation) discharge was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

 Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500780

    Original file (MD1500780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling stating the Applicant is not recommended for reenlistment by reason of Fraudulent Enlistment for: Adjustment disorder; History of ADHD. During the enlistment process into the Marine Corps, the Applicant was asked to provide any medical history of counseling or treatment for a mental health condition which he denied. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400761

    Original file (ND1400761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other narrative reason other than Fraudulent Entry more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300945

    Original file (MD1300945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Full relief to Honorable was not granted since the Applicant served only 16 days and so an Uncharacterized discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded narrative reason for separation shall change to but the characterization of service shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201179

    Original file (MD1201179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:Fraudulent Enlistment and Major Depression Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20090903 - 20091213Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20091214Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20091222Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)09 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:62MOS: NFIRProficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500504

    Original file (ND1500504.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700173

    Original file (ND0700173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 2 (): The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301210

    Original file (ND1301210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20100503 - 20120618Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120619Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20120719Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 41EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800260

    Original file (ND0800260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20060428 - 20060910Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060911Period of enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20061018Length of Service: Yrs Mths08 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 38Highest Rank/Rate:SNEvaluation marks:Performance: N/AAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol Periods of UA/CONF: NJPs:Retention...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500696

    Original file (ND1500696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901661

    Original file (ND0901661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant has requested a change in his characterization of service, separation code and narrative reason contending he did not fraudulently enlist in the military. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Accordingly, the narrative reason for separation shall change to and the separation code shall be changed to JFF. ” Additional...