Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501260
Original file (MD1501260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-Pvt, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20150619
Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT
Reenlistment Code: RE-4
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3 [PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)
         Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED
         Reentry Code change to: RE-3 or better
        
Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
Inactive:        USMCR (DEP)      20120523 - 20120911 COG         Active:  NONE

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20120912    Age at Enlistment: 18
Period of Enlistment: 4 Years 0 Months
Date of Discharge: 20140328     Highest Rank: PRIVATE
Length of Service: 01 Year(s) 06 Month(s) 17 Day(s)
Education Level: 12     AFQT: 53
MOS: 6314
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): 3.3 (NFIR) / 3.3 (NFIR)     Fitness Reports: NOT APPLICABLE

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Rifle EX NDSM GWOTSM LoA(2)

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: 2

- 20130405:      Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation; O/A 2013033 onboard NAS Pensacola, FL, SNM did not sign out in liberty log.)
         Article 108 (Military Property; loss, damage, destruction, disposition; O/A 20130320 onboard NAS Pensacola, FL, SNM purposefully damaged military property when he urinated on another Marine’s mattress, pillow and linens.)
         Article 121 (Larceny; O/A 2013033 onboard NAS Pensacola, FL, SNM wrongfully appropriated a video game from the NEX.)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: NONE

- 20131219:      Article 121 (Larceny; o/A 20131116, SNM used another service members ATM card without permission to withdraw $500.)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: NONE

SCM: NONE       

SPCM: NONE      

CC: NONE


Retention Warning Counseling: 10

- 20130106:      For inability to follow orders and your integrity. You were found with a cell phone in your possession after being told to turn them in.

- 20130405:      For violation of Article 92, 108 and 121 resulting in NJP.

- 20130826:      For failing three back to back room inspections.

- 20131127:      For failure to live within my own means.

- 20131127:      For failure to be at appointed place of duty following the Veteran’s Day 96 hour liberty period.

- 20131219:      For violations of Article 121 resulting in NJP.

- 20140103:      For failure to be at appointed place of duty following a special liberty period granted to attend a funeral.

- 20140121:      For separation due to pattern of misconduct.

- 20140224:      For receiving semiannual conduct marks below 4.0 and proficiency marks below 3.0.

- 20140226:      For loss of government property specifically ID card.


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        


Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant accepts responsibility for his actions and contends that he should not be punished the rest of his life for stupid mistakes that he made at the age of eighteen.

Decision


Date: 20150910  DOCUMENTARY REVIEW      Location: Washington D.C.        Representation: NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS .
 By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.] The Applicant’s record of service included ten 6105 counseling warnings, two non-judicial punishments (NJPs) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), Article 108 (Military Property; loss, damage, destruction, disposition), and Article 121 (Larceny). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant accepts responsibility for his actions and contends that he should not be punished the rest of his life for stupid mistakes that he made at the age of eighteen. The Applicant’s record documents ten counseling warnings and two NJPs indicating a series of willful misconduct over the period of a year. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a member engages in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging. Most servicemembers, however, serve honorably and therefore earn their Honorable discharges. In fairness to those Marines and Sailors who served honorably, Commanders and Separation Authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving servicemembers receive no higher characterization than is due. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge was appropriate when considering the length of service and number of UCMJ violations and was consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00514

    Original file (MD02-00514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00514 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020305, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 108, disposition of military property, Article 121, larceny, Article...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600293

    Original file (MD0600293.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. When the service of a member of the U.S . The Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning, a vacation of suspended punishment for continuing misconduct, and one nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 108 (damage to military property of a value of $100 o r less), 121 (larceny), 130 (housebreaking, and 134 (unlawful entry) .

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801205

    Original file (MD0801205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: NONE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Record of service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500920

    Original file (ND1500920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500601

    Original file (MD1500601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 15April 2005. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501170

    Original file (ND1501170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500558

    Original file (ND0500558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: None were submitted PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: 901228 – 910820 (DEP) COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900821 Date of Discharge: 930317 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 06 27 Inactive: 00 07 23 No indication of appeal in the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500728

    Original file (MD1500728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00855

    Original file (MD01-00855.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00855 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010712, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 68 Highest Rank: LCpl Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Proficiency: 3.6 (5) Conduct: 3.6 (5) Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge, SSDR Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00508

    Original file (ND01-00508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00508 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010313, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I tried for an appeal and did not get past the Command Master Chief. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained...