Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501253
Original file (MD1501253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20150612
Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNCHARACTERIZED
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT
Reenlistment Code: RE-3F
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MARCORSEPMAN 6205 [ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to: NONE REQUESTED
         Narrative Reason change to: REQUESTED, BUT NOT SPECIFIED

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
Inactive:        USMCR (DEP)      20080205 - 20080420 COG         Active:  NONE

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080421    Age at Enlistment: 25
Period of Enlistment: 4 Years 0 Months
Date of Discharge: 20080807     Highest Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Length of Service: 00 Year(s) 03 Month(s) 17 Day(s)
Education Level: GED    AFQT: 49
MOS: 8000
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): NFIR / NFIR         Fitness Reports: NOT APPLICABLE

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: NONE

SCM: NONE

SPCM: NONE

CC: NONE

Retention Warning Counseling: NONE


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        


Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6205, ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends that the ID code does not match the reason for separation.

Decision


Date: 20150903  DOCUMENTARY REVIEW      Location: Washington D.C.        Representation: NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED .
 By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no 6105 counseling warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on a lack of reasonable effort during recruit training, his command administratively processed him for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, and submit a written statement.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that the ID code does not match the reason for separation. The Applicant did not specify which ID code, and there is no block on the DD214 that is titled “ID Code.” The service record contained an Administrative Remarks (Form 1070) dated 07 August 2008 that stated the Applicant was being separated because of Entry Level Performance and Conduct due to Lack of Reasonable Effort and would be assigned a Reentry Code of RE-3F. Since the Applicant was notified of separation before 180 days, the appropriate character of service is Uncharacterized. The Narrative Reason for Separation should be Entry Level Performance and Conduct. The corresponding Separation Code, JGA1, is proper. Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual the Reentry Code of RE-3F indicates that recruit training was not completed and requires a service record entry signed by the service member which was present in the record. The DD-214 is accurate and properly reflects the appropriate information. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501148

    Original file (MD0501148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Convince of Govt.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Depressive disorder NOS.040316: Counseling entry: Entry Level Performance and Conduct for: FAILURE TO ADAPT TO THE MARINE CORPS ENVIRONMENT. The MARCORSEPMAN also states that “all personnel administratively separated from recruit...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00404

    Original file (MD03-00404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00404 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030109. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The porpoise of this letter is to ask you (the Board) to consider in changing my reason of my discharge from the United States Marine Corps in 1998.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01060

    Original file (MD99-01060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960927 - 961118 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961119 Date of Discharge: 970121 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 02 03 Inactive: None Applicant acknowledged that he...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000432

    Original file (MD1000432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the NDRB found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant’s DD-214 was completed by the administrative servicing center incorrectly and requires corrections based on the awarded separation. The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700584

    Original file (MD0700584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19950221 - 19950326...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300054

    Original file (MD1300054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The criteria used by the VA in determining whether a former servicemember is eligible for benefits are different than that used by the Marine Corps when determining a member’s discharge characterization or narrative reason for separation. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00079

    Original file (MD04-00079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00079 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031014. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600871

    Original file (MD0600871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decisional Issues Equity – Basis for discharge Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) (2)2 Pages from the Applicant’s Service Record Letter of Recommendation from L_ R_ B_, Ph.d., dtd October 13, 2006Character Reference ltr from S_ P_,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601000

    Original file (MD0601000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20010423Narrative Reason(s): ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCTLeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20010423Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): ENTRY LEVEL(20010419)SJA review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01151

    Original file (MD02-01151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01151 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020805, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The factual basis for this recommendation was refusal to train. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 011203 with an entry level separation (uncharacterized) due to entry level performance and conduct (A).