Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500827
Original file (MD1500827.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20150318
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Reenlistment Code:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
        
Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
Inactive:        USMCR (DEP)      20071218 - 20080127     Active: 

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080128    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20081126     Highest Rank:
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 12 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 48
MOS: 9900
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): () / 2.4 ()        Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Rifle

Periods of UA/CONF: UA (109) 20080706 - 20081022

NJP:

- 20081029:      Article
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

CIVIL ARREST:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20080530:      For violation of Article 92 in SNM was caught smoking while conducting area clean up

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Types of Witnesses Who Testified

         Expert:           Character:      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86.



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to be eligible for Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his misconduct was caused by abuse and mistreatment from senior Marines in his command.

Decision


Date: 20150521           Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning, and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave; 109 days). Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to be eligible for Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of facilitating access to VA benefits. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing educational opportunities or employment opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of the propriety and the equity of a discharge. As such, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the NDRB can grant relief.
: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his misconduct was caused by abuse and mistreatment from senior Marines in his command. After Marine Corps boot camp, the Applicant reported to School of Infantry (SOI) for continued entry level training. The Applicant complained of bilateral knee pain and was diagnosed with Patellofemoral Syndrome (PFS) in May 2008, and assigned to rehabilitation and physical therapy. The Applicant’s medical records show that he was treated for 2 months and on 30 June 2008 he claimed his pain was increasing with physical therapy, and refused to return to training at SOI. The Applicant stated he had retained legal counsel who told him he had the right to have a medical evaluation board (MEB). The Applicant was referred to mental health and scheduled to return to training on 17 July 2008. The Applicant’s record shows that he began a period of 109 days unauthorized absence from his unit on 6 July 2008 until he surrendered on 22 October 2008. The Applicant submitted to the NDRB a letter from a Marine Corps lawyer who interviewed him over the telephone, at the time he was absent from his unit, as a witness in another case. The Applicant told the JAG that he left his unit to take care of his family’s business that was on the verge of failure due to his father’s severe illness. When the Applicant returned to his unit, he was found guilty at NJP for violation of Article 86, and his command processed him for administrative separation. There is no evidence in the Applicant’s record, nor did he provide any evidence, other than his statements, that his command mistreated him. If the Applicant felt there were mitigating factors that might have explained his choice to violate the UCMJ, he could have refused NJP and demanded a trial by court-martial to defend himself, or exercised his right to an administrative separation board to make complaints of abuse in his unit and ask to be retained in the Marine Corps. The Applicant chose instead to accept NJP, and waive his right to an administrative separation board; thus accepting his separation from the Marine Corps with Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501084

    Original file (MD1501084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings for unacceptable behavior associated with Mental Health conditions, and for diagnosis of Mental Health conditions: Axis I: Adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotion (anxiety) and conduct (unauthorized absence, inconsistent accounts); and Axis II: Narcissistic personality traits. The Applicant submits to the NDRB a letter from a civilian Licensed Psychologist dated 26 July 2010, that contends the Applicant “did...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001439

    Original file (MD1001439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on all the documentary evidence available to the command, to include the mental health evaluations and the UA offense, the Applicant’s command administratively processed him for separation in accordance with the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN). He is apathetic to military life and mostly keeps to himself … .” After thorough examination of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s testimony, the Board determined this issue to be without merit and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002050

    Original file (MD1002050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801785

    Original file (MD0801785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion Issues 1-2: () .The Applicant contends the separation authority considered his pre-service drug use and additional alleged positive urinalysis when determining his characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. As for the issue regarding characterization, the Commander’s letter (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION PROCEEDING IN THE CASE OF PRIVATE P. A. C.USMC), Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, states, “In evaluating...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001064

    Original file (MD1001064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001388

    Original file (MD1001388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500435

    Original file (MD1500435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301467

    Original file (MD1301467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201599

    Original file (MD1201599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500642

    Original file (MD1500642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant states as evidence of his Honorable service that he received a Good Conduct Medal; however, Good Conduct Medals are only awarded after each three year period of continuous Honorable service with no misconduct resulting in NJP. In addition, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a discharge either to, or from, a medical disability. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...