Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401382
Original file (ND1401382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AZAA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20140610
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to: CONVENIENCE

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
Inactive:         USNR (DEP)        20030924 - 20031027     Active:            20031028 - 20090830

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 200 90831     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20101215      Highest Rank/Rate: AZ3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 1 6 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 53
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.07

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      FLoC (4) AFSM EAWS ESWS

Period of UA: 20100927-20101029, 33 days

NJP:

- 20100816 :      Article ( Absence without leave )
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation )
         Awarded: RIR Suspended: Suspension vacated 20100908
         [Extracted from Evaluation Report and Counseling Record dated 20100920.]

- 2010 0 908 :       Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :







Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ 7 years 0 months 15 days ”
         Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, BATTLE "E" RIBBON, FLAG LETTER OF COMMENDATION, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON(4), ARMED FORCES SERVICE MEDAL, ENLISTED AVIATION WARFARE SPECIALIST INSIGNIA, ENLISTED SURFACE WARFARE SPECIALIST INSIGNIA ”
         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 20031028 UNTIL 20090830 ”
         “ ”
         “ 2010092 7 - 201010 29 ; 33 days ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant requests this board change her re-enlistment code and remove and destroy all military records concerning her misconduct .
2.       The Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable as her in-service misconduct resulted from her depression .
3.       The Applicant contends she was improperly discharged by not being counseled about her right to an administrative discharge board and requests her narrative reason for separation and separations code be changed to atone for this impropriety .

Decision

Date : 20 1 4 1009             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Absence without leave , ), Article ( Failure to obey order or regulation , ), and Article ( Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances; ) . The Applicant also entered into an absent without leave status for 33 days subsequent to her second NJP starting 27 September and ending on 29 October 2010. Following this period of unauthorized absence the record shows the Applicant was hospitalized for depression/ psychosis from 1 to 16 November 2010. The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board. However, per the Applicants DD Form 214, the Separation Code HKK indicates the Applicant waived h er right to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant requests this board change her re-enlistment code and remove and destroy all military records concerning her misconduct . Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Requests to expunge material from the Applicant’s military record are outside of the scope of this board but may be made to the BCNR.

 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable as her in-service misconduct resulted from her depression . In making this argument the Applicant implies that the entirety of her service spanning two enlistments and an extension should also be taken into consideration. The Applicant completed h er first enlistment period with an Honorable characterization of h er service for that period of service, however, each period of enlistment is an independent obligation, and characterization of service is determined for that specific period. Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the na rrative reason for separation.
When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition or diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. The use of illegal drugs, absence without leave, and failing to obey lawful orders and regulations were all conscious decisions to violate the tenants of honorable and faithful service. While the Applicant may feel that h er depression was a contribu ting factor to h er misconduct, it do es not mitigate her disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the Naval Service, demonstrating s he was unsuitable for further service. Relief denied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was improperly discharged by not being counseled about her right to an administrative discharge board and requests her narrative reason for separation and separations code be changed to atone for this impropriety . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that she was denied any of her rights during her discharge process. The evidence of the record clearly shows that she was provided counseling after her second NJP stating she was being recommended for separation due to her violation of the Navy’s Zero Tolerance Drug Policy. After signing this counseling on 9 September 2010 the record shows the Applicant entered into an absent without leave status for 33 days starting on 27 September and ending on 29 October 2010. Following this period of unauthorized absence the record shows the Applicant was hospitalized for depression/psychosis fro m 1 to 16 November 2010. Furthermore , the Applicant ’s DD Form 214 separation code indicates the Applicant waived her right to an administrative board . The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700418

    Original file (ND0700418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation: NA.20031021: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Administrative separation physical for desertion. Recommendation: NA Discharge Process Charge(s) and Specification(s):NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Submitted SILT request: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Discharged: 20031028 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200846

    Original file (ND1200846.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900976

    Original file (ND0900976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on a review of the record of evidence, the Board determined that there was sufficient evidence to support a basis for separation due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by her three NJPs and one retention warning during this enlistment. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201010

    Original file (MD1201010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the Applicant’s service records and her statement, the NDRB noted that she was diagnosed while in service with non-combat-related PTSD, chronic mental illness, and major depression. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100622

    Original file (ND1100622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews :...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901983

    Original file (ND0901983.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400844

    Original file (MD1400844.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301294

    Original file (MD1301294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Applicant contends her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200035

    Original file (ND1200035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301802

    Original file (MD1301802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.