NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900468
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Board has determined an administrative error has occurred on the Applicant’s DD 214 and the Characterization of Service should be corrected to read; “HONORABLE. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401618
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00789
Applicant accepted findings of the Medical Board.960412: PEB (Physical Evaluation Board) advised applicant that he was unfit for duty due to the diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder NOS, 29890 with a 30% disability rating and that he would be placed n the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). RECOMMENDATION: Pt's condition has remained about the same since his last Medical Board evaluation. When reviewing a discharge, the Board does consider the extent to which a medical problem, diagnosed...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902200
The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s case and determined that the Marine Corps made a decision not to separate the Applicant due to his misconduct and instead, redeployed him for the second time with a known PTSD diagnosis. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201246
Although the Applicant’s misconduct during his enlistment warranted a Bad Conduct Discharge as the result of a Special Court-Martial, or at the very least, an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization as the result of administrative separation for misconduct, the NDRB is not authorized to change a discharge to a more unfavorable level. Despite the Applicant’s deployment to Iraq, his record contained repetitive, serious misconduct and below-average Proficiency and Conduct marks...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101360
Relief warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remainPHYSICALDISABILITY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200986
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Representation: By a vote of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300003
Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The Applicant contends his discharge was too harsh.During the Applicant’s four years of service, he was found guilty at three NJPs for serious offenses and received a retention warning after his first NJP that warned that he could be discharged if he committed further misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201828
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was improper, because one cannot waive his right to an administrative board while in custody in a civilian prison. The evidence of record also reflects the Applicant was provided the opportunity to present his case before an administrative board, but he waived that right, thus accepting the discharge recommended in the letter of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400757
Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20010404 - 20010916Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20010917Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060226Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)10 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:66MOS: 0621Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle (2) Pistol CAR (2)Periods of UA/CONF:...