Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401277

Original file (ND1401277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MR2, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140624

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: DISABILITY, TEMPORARY
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1850-030 [TEMPORARY DISABILITY RETIRED LIST (TDRL)]

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       MEDICAL


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19851108 - 19860112     Active: USN      19860113 - 19900112

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20010831     Age at Enlistment: 41
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20031113      Highest Rank/Rate: MR2
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
         Active: Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 20 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 25
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.29

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol AFRM (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 22 September 2004, Article 1850 - 030 , SEPARATION BY REASON OF TEMPORARY DISABILITY RETIRED LIST (TDRL ) .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks 100 percent eligibility for the Post 9/11 GI Bill.
2.       The Applicant contends he was placed on the Permanent Disability Retirement List and believes his narrative reason should reflect a medical discharge.

Decision

Date : 20141021             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall DISABILITY, TEMPORARY .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. The record shows the Applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on or about 13 November 2003 and subsequently transferred to the Retired List on 01 January 2007.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks 100 percent eligibility for the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was placed on the Permanent Disability Retirement List and believes his narrative reason should reflect a medical discharge. The Applicant’s concerns are regarding his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Since the Applicant was a Naval Reservist, his DD Form 214 was not his final discharge paperwork from the Navy ; rather as the nomenclature describes, it was his release from active duty. The record shows the Applicant was activated from 22 October 2001 to 11 June 2003. Upon his release from active duty, the record shows the Applicant was eligible for Non-Drilling Notice of Eligibility / Line of Duty benefits. The record further shows the Applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on or about 13 November 2003 and subsequently transferred to the Retired List on 01 January 2007. The NDRB discerned no impropriety with the Applicant’s DD Form 214 . Regardless, t he NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical-related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can grant this type of narrative reason change. However, the record indicates that the Applicant was in fact placed on the TDRL and subsequently placed on the Permanent Disability Retirement List (PDRL) . The NDRB encourages the Applicant to submit his service record along with the documents he provided with his DD Form 293 as well as this decisional document to the VA to determine his eligibility for Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain DISABILITY, TEMPORARY. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900468

Original file (ND0900468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Board has determined an administrative error has occurred on the Applicant’s DD 214 and the Characterization of Service should be corrected to read; “HONORABLE. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401618

Original file (ND1401618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00789

Original file (ND00-00789.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant accepted findings of the Medical Board.960412: PEB (Physical Evaluation Board) advised applicant that he was unfit for duty due to the diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder NOS, 29890 with a 30% disability rating and that he would be placed n the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). RECOMMENDATION: Pt's condition has remained about the same since his last Medical Board evaluation. When reviewing a discharge, the Board does consider the extent to which a medical problem, diagnosed...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902200

Original file (MD0902200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s case and determined that the Marine Corps made a decision not to separate the Applicant due to his misconduct and instead, redeployed him for the second time with a known PTSD diagnosis. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201246

Original file (MD1201246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the Applicant’s misconduct during his enlistment warranted a Bad Conduct Discharge as the result of a Special Court-Martial, or at the very least, an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization as the result of administrative separation for misconduct, the NDRB is not authorized to change a discharge to a more unfavorable level. Despite the Applicant’s deployment to Iraq, his record contained repetitive, serious misconduct and below-average Proficiency and Conduct marks...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101360

Original file (MD1101360.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remainPHYSICALDISABILITY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200986

Original file (ND1200986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Representation: By a vote of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300003

Original file (ND1300003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The Applicant contends his discharge was too harsh.During the Applicant’s four years of service, he was found guilty at three NJPs for serious offenses and received a retention warning after his first NJP that warned that he could be discharged if he committed further misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201828

Original file (ND1201828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was improper, because one cannot waive his right to an administrative board while in custody in a civilian prison. The evidence of record also reflects the Applicant was provided the opportunity to present his case before an administrative board, but he waived that right, thus accepting the discharge recommended in the letter of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400757

Original file (MD1400757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20010404 - 20010916Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20010917Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060226Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)10 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:66MOS: 0621Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle (2) Pistol CAR (2)Periods of UA/CONF:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401277

Similar Decisions