Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401225
Original file (ND1401225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20140619
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL ACT
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      
         Reentry Code change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20000110 - 20000130     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20000131     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20010822      Highest Rank/Rate: 52
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 52
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NOB ( 1 )      Behavior: 1.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 1.00

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 30, effective 24 August 2000 until
14 May 2002, Article 1910-148, Separation by Reason of Homosexual Conduct.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends she was never offered or allowed to seek counsel.
2.       The Applicant contends the allegations surrounding her discharge were never proven.
3.       The Applicant contends she served Honorably.
Decision

Date : 20141009             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ACT.
By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Due to the allegations of a homosexual act occurring, which the commanding officer found to be credible, an investigation into the alleged misconduct was conducted. As a result of the investigation, to include statements provided by the Applicant, it was determined that the Applicant had engaged in a homosexual act on more than one occasion. Based on the Applicant ’s homosexual acts , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was never offered or allowed to seek counsel. The record shows the Applicant acknowledged her right to consult with a lawyer when advised of her Military Suspect’s Acknowledgement and Waiver of Rights on 03 April 2001. Additionally, the record clearly shows the Applicant waived her rights to consult with qualified counsel when she was notified of administrative separation processing on 28 June 2001. Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s contention is without merit. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the allegations surrounding her discharge were never proven. In accordance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27 (effective 24 August 2000 until 14 May 2002), Article 1910-148, Separation by Reason of Homosexual Conduct, which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, the command investigation documented that she had engaged in homosexual relationships and created a rebuttable presumption that she had the propensity to engage in homosexual acts. The Applicant was processed administratively for involuntary separation and was assigned a corresponding reentry code of RE-4. At the time of discharge, processing for separation was mandatory in accordance with the MILPERSMAN and Department of Defense Policy under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law. The record of evidence clearly shows the Applicant waived h er right to an administrative separation board. If the Applicant felt s he was mistakenly charged of homosexual acts , it was h er obligation to contest those charges at the time they were made. During an administrative separation board, s he would have had the opportunity to mount a defense against the charges. The Investigating Officer letter dated 10 April 2001 describes that the Applicant admitted to engaging in homosexual conduct with another sailor on board USS KITTY HAWK. The evidence demonstrating that the Applicant committed homosexual acts w hile in the Navy is quite extensive and counters the Applicant’s contention. The Applicant submitted no evidence to support her contention ; therefore, the NDRB must rely upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of Government affairs. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she served Honorably. Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a member engages in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. Per MILPERSMAN 1910-148, an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization is warranted when during the current term of service, the member attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act with aggravating circumstances such as being aboard a naval vessel. The record clearly shows the Applicant engaged in sexual activity aboard the USS KITTY HAWK. Regardless of the Applicant’s sexual orientation, the NDRB determined the Applicant engaged in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constituted a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain HOMOSEXUAL ACT . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000406

    Original file (ND1000406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB is limited to conducting reviews to examine the propriety and the equity of an Applicant’s discharge and is authorized to change the character of service or the reason for discharge, based on those factors, if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. A request for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600276

    Original file (ND0600276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214Letter to Applicant from Department of Veterans Affairs, dtd August 19, 2005 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20020130 - 20020505 COGActive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20020506 Date of Discharge: 20040225 Length of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200461

    Original file (ND1200461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Given the documents of record, the Applicant’s personal statement, and the commanding officer’s statement in the administrative separation endorsement, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s separation by reason of Homosexual Conduct (Acts), in accordance with Article 1910-148 of the MILPERSMAN, was proper at the time it was issued.Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300701

    Original file (ND1300701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Given the detailed documents of record, the Applicant’s personal statement, and the commanding officer’s statement in the administrative separation endorsement, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation by reason of Homosexual Conduct, in accordance with Article 1910-148 of the MILPERSMAN, coupled with the misconduct of record, was proper and equitable at the time it was issued. Accordingly, the NDRB determined that the narrative reason for separation will change to Secretarial...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300376

    Original file (ND1300376.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Reentry Code change to: RE-1 Separation Code change to: JFF Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20040720 - 20040810Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040811Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20061218Highest Rank/Rate:E3/GSFNLength of Service:Years Months08 DaysEducation Level:AFQT:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201222

    Original file (ND1201222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902262

    Original file (ND0902262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600104

    Original file (ND0600104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Honorable Conditions.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I was only informed that I would receive a honorable discharge, and that is why I have an issue with my separation code, Re-entry code, and narrative reason of discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00054

    Original file (ND04-00054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00054 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031006. “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record, we aver on behalf of this former member that the narrative reason for discharge, Homosexual Conduct Admission, is erroneous and warrants the Board’s relief with amendment to Secretarial Authority.” The Applicant stated she was a homosexual on 20000327.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301035

    Original file (ND1301035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ACT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption,...