Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400931

Original file (ND1400931.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-DKSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140415

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19980814 - 19990712     Active:
Inactive:         USNR (DEP)        20000229 - 20000307

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20000308     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20041115      Highest Rank/Rate: DK3
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 08 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 52
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 8 )      Behavior: 3.4 ( 8 )        OTA: 3.22

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA :

NJP :

S CM :

SPCM:

- 20040218 :       Art icle (False Official Statements)
         Art icle (Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation) 2 Specifications
         Sentence : , CONF 9 months (20040218 – 20040313, 24 days) ,
         Suspended: RIR below E-3 , CONF in excess of 30 days , A utomatic forfeitures
         C A Action: The sentence was approved and, except for that part of the sentence extending to a bad-conduct discharge, will be executed, but the execution of that part of the sentence adjudging confinement in excess of 30 days and reduction in rate below the pay grade of E-3 is suspended for a period of one year, at which time, unless the suspension is sooner vacated, the suspended part of the sentence will be remitted without further action.

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ DKSN ”
         “ E3 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 8, effective 9 September 2004 until
18 September 2005, Article 5815-010, EXECUTING A DISHONORABLE OR BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends it was an isolated incident that does not reflect the character of service and achievements he had while in the service.

Decision

Date : 20 1 4 0918 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included for of the UCMJ: Article 107 ( False Official Statements , one specific ation ) and Article 121 ( Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation , two specifications). Based on the Applicant's conviction and sentence at a special court-martial, he was confined and separated with a Bad Conduct characterization of service. The Applicant’s SPCM decision was fully reviewed and the Bad Conduct Discharge was ordered executed by Special Court-Martial Supplemental Order No. 041937.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends it was an isolated incident that does not reflect the character of service and achievements he had while in the service. The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 1 8 February 200 4 . A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process. Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge, reduction in rank to the grade of E1 , and confinement for a period of nine months . The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended all confinement in excess of 30 days , reduction in rank below the grade of E3, and suspension of all automatic forfeitures in accordance with the terms of a pretrial agreement. The Applicant’s defense counsel submitted a request for clemency to the convening authority on 22 April 2004 which was subsequently denied. The case was then submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals without assignments of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed on 10 November 200 4 . The NDRB found the evidence of record did not contain sufficient mitigating or extenuating factors to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700772

Original file (MD0700772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issue 2: (Clemency). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20010706 - 20020631Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020701Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050222Length of Service: 2 Yrs 1Mths0 DysLost Time:Days UA:129 Days...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900027

Original file (ND0900027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined based on the NJP for the Article 92 violation, the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800738

Original file (ND0800738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received, “ Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing andis directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs concerning Additional Reviews and Automatic Upgrades .Should the Applicant feel...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900866

Original file (MD0900866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800053

Original file (ND0800053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00563

Original file (MD04-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

CA 950203: Sentence approved and, except for the bad conduct discharge, ordered executed, but the execution of that portion of the sentence adjudging confinement in excess of 90 days is suspended for a period of 12 months from date of this action, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended confinement will be remitted without further action. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800386

Original file (MD0800386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, was marred by a guilty finding at a Summary Court-Martial for violation of UCMJ Article 112a. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801492

Original file (ND0801492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800953

Original file (MD0800953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002014

Original file (ND1002014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20000317 - 20000328Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000329Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20030708Highest Rank/Rate:DKSNLength of Service: Years Months10 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(4)Behavior:2.5(4)OTA: 2.86Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):SSDR,...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400931

Similar Decisions