Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400719

Original file (ND1400719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-GM3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140305

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20030131 - 20030626     Active:

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20030627     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20061115      Highest Rank/Rate: GM3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 19 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 46
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.2 ( 4 )      Behavior: 2.7 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.25

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Rifle Pistol (2) FLoC

Period of UA : 20060803-20060807, 4 days. C ONF :

NJP:    SCM:    SPCM:          CC:     Retention Warning Counseling:

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) ”
         “ 06AUG03-06AUG07 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant raised administrative pay issues related to his discharge and final payment.
2.       The Applicant wants an upgrade to improve employment opportunities.
3.       The Applicant contends he did not knowingly take Tylenol III .
4.       The Applicant c ontends his battalion’s conduct was negligent, and he may have been set up because he insisted armory regulations be followed to the letter.
5 .       The Applicant contends he served honorably for 3 years.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0826            Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Though the record is unclear as to exactly what drug abuse the Applicant committed, he referenced Tylenol III in his application to the NDRB. The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Navy. Based on a violation of the Navy’s zero-tolerance drug policy, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . However, the Applicant’s DD Form 214 has a separation code of GKK , indicating the Applicant exercised his right to appear before an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant raised administrative pay issues related to his discharge and final payment. The NDRB has no jurisdiction over pay issues. T he Applicant can apply to the B oard for Correction of Naval Records using DD Form 149 with this issue.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants an upgrade to improve employment opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: ( D ecisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends he did not knowingly take Tylenol III. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he did not knowingly take Tylenol III. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Although the Applicant’s record is incomplete, his DD Form 214 Separation Code indicates he presented his case for retention before an administrative separation board and was discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant c ontends his battalion’s conduct was negligent, and he may have been set up because he insisted armory regulations be followed to the letter. A complete review of the records did not reveal negligence that materially affected the propriety or equity of the Applicant’s discharge nor was there any evidence of the Applicant being set up to fail a urinalysis. Relief denied.

Issue 5 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he served honorably for 3 years. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Navy to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of the Navy’s drug policy is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade, performance, awards, deployments, schools, or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. However, his command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge was equitable and consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until 1 June 2008, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000390

Original file (ND1000390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000155

Original file (ND1000155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge from General (Under Honorable Conditions) to Honorable in order to receive employment. A final determination of this charge was not found in the Applicant’s service record but was referred to by the Commanding Officer in the Administrative Separation determination.Based on the offenses committed...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401745

Original file (ND1401745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence,...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000662

Original file (ND1000662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20061030 - 20061114Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20061115Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090226Highest Rank/Rate: GM3Length of Service: Years Months12 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 46EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(1)Behavior:2.0(2)OTA: 3.16Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400716

Original file (ND1400716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20011019 - 20011203Active:20011204 - 20060330 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060331Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070720Highest Rank/Rate: GM3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 21 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 47EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.3(3)Behavior:1.7(3)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201088

Original file (ND1201088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

of controlled substances-wrongfully distribute 7 Percocet pills) Sentence: 100 days (20080731-20081011, 73 days)Retention Warning Counseling:- 20060809: For failure to meet body composition assessment standards Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200437

Original file (ND1200437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

30 days in jail (susp), 30 days revocation of license 3) $25 fine plus $30 court costRetention Warning Counseling:- 19990112:Forcivilian convictions for DUI, driving on a suspended license, and improper U-turn 19980916 Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400575

Original file (ND1400575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401067

Original file (ND1401067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s diagnosis of Personality Disorder by competent medical authority, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300012

Original file (ND1300012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant elected his right to appear before an administrative separation board, which determined the preponderance of the evidence supported Misconduct (Serious Offense) and recommended separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400719

Similar Decisions