Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400661

Original file (ND1400661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ENFA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140226

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20080407 - 20081105     Active:
         USNR (DEP)        20081112 - 20081130

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20081201     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20120829      Highest Rank/Rate: ENFN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 29 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 53
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.2 ( 5 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 5 )        OTA: 3.04

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) JMU A (3)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20120504 :      Article (False official statements)
         Article (Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel)
         Article 134 (General A rticle - disorderly conduct, drunkenness)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    CC:

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20120407 :       Charges: Driving under the influence and speeding [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 20120821]

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20111208 :       For failure to meet body composition assessment standards

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 12 July 2011 until Present, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT FAILURE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant wants to be eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) education benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends she is being punished for her physical condition and was never given the appropriate opportunity to pass the Physical Readiness Test (PRT) .
3.       The Applicant contends her record of service warrants an upgrade.
4 .       The Applicant contends her post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade.

Decision

Date : 20 1 4 0807             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one retention warning for failure to meet body composition standards, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 107 ( False official statements , falsifying a physical assessment log entry ), Article 111 ( Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel , BAC 0.09% ), and Article 134 ( General A rticle , disorderly conduct, drunkenness ) , and one civilian arrest for driving under the influence . The Applicant failed three separate Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA) cycles in a four year period by not meeting Navy fitness standards for weight and body fat percentage. The Applicant was notified of her command’s intent to process her for administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense) and P hysical S tandards. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to be eligible for VA education benefits. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of facilitating access to VA benefits. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing educational opportunities or employment opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of the propriety and the equity of a discharge. As such, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the NDRB can grant relief.

Issues 2-3: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she is being punished for her physical condition, she was never given the appropriate opportunity to pass the PRT, and she served honorably for almost 3 years and 9 months. Per Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 12 July 2011 until Present, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT FAILURE , the characterization of service for separation due to Physical Standards should be Honorable unless a General is warranted. The Applicant was not awarded a General characterization because of her genetics or because of an issue that was out of her control. Rather, the Applicant was awarded a General characterization because of her misconduct. An Under Honorable Conditions (General) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. The Applicant’s record shows she was found guilty at NJP for DUI, disorderly conduct (drunkenness), and making a false official statement and was arrested by civilian authorities for DUI . After a thorough review of her records, the NDRB determined her discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.

Issue 4 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement, evidence of a clean police record, evidence of college attendance, and three character references. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. The Board determined t he characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001862

Original file (ND1001862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted,...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801717

Original file (ND0801717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20020416 - 20020619 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020620Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20070315Length of Service: Years Months26 Days Education Level: Age at Enlistment: AFQT: 95Highest Rank/Rate: MM3 Evaluation Marks: Performance: NFIR Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIRAwards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101451

Original file (ND1101451.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20040322 - 20040929Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040930Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070827Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 69EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.7(3)Behavior:1.7(3)OTA: 2.45Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):ESWSPeriods...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301437

Original file (ND1301437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. With her frequent misconduct during her enlistment, the Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001283

Original file (ND1001283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300609

Original file (ND1300609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends that despite her two nonjudicial punishments (NJPs), her eight years of service were faithful and honorable.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301895

Original file (ND1301895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she was being processed for discharge for a physical or mental condition prior to her discharge for a pattern of misconduct.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500917

Original file (ND1500917.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to but the narrative reason for separation shall remain PHYSICAL STANDARDS. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700535

Original file (ND0700535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and the award of two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86 (Failure to go to appointed place of duty, Article 86 (Absent from appointed place of duty, and Article 134 (Drunkenness).An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000512

Original file (ND1000512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400661

Similar Decisions