Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400270
Original file (ND1400270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20131126
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19990625 - 19990714     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19990715     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20010827      Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 13 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 41
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.25
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF : UA: 20010402-20010827, 148 days (I n Hands of Civil Authorities ) / CONF:

NJP :
- 20001207 :      Article (General A rticle , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Underage drinking
         Specification 2: Drunk on duty
         Awarded: Suspended: 10 DAYS

S CM :    SPCM:

C C :
- 20010604 :       Offense: Rape of a child in the First Degree and rape of a child in the Second Degree
         Sentence : N ot Found in Record

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20 0 10124 :       For your lack of attention to detail, your display of poor judgment, and your irresponsibility; more specifically, your consumption of alcohol while under the legal drinking age and your inability to properly perform your duties due to your overindulgence of alcohol.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ 01 07 18 ”
         “ ”
         “ MISCONDUCT ”
         “ 01APR02 TO 01AUG27 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, effective 25 January 2001 until 21 August 2002,
Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 120 .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends he served h onorably for two years with only one in discretion for underage drinking and drunk on duty.
 2.       The Applicant contends he did not fraudulently enlist.

Decision

Date : 20140605             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 134 (General A rticle, 2 specifications : Specification 1: Underage drinking and Specification 2: Drunk on duty) and one civilian conviction for rape of a child in the first degree and rape of a child in the second degree. Based on the offense s committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . The Applicant was notified of separation proceedings for Fraudulent Entry into the Naval Service and Commission of a Serious Offense.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he served h onorably for two years with only one in discretion for underage drinking and drunk on duty. The record clearly shows the Applicant had additional misconduct than his underage drinking and drunk on duty . The record shows that while in service, the Applicant pled guilty and was convicted in civilian court for rape of a child in the first degree and rape of a child in the second degree . The record also shows the Applicant committed these acts while on active duty and at home after boot camp. Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s contention to be without merit. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not fraudulently enlist. The record clearl y shows the Applicant was notified of separation proceedings for Fraudulent Entry into the Naval Service and Commission of a Serious Offense. The NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The statements and documents provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The Applicant was provided the opportunity to present his case before an administrative board, but he waived that right, thus accepting the discharge recommended in the letter of notification. Further, the Separati on Authority determined the Applicant’s primary reason for separation was Commission of a Serious Offense . In accordance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual, servicemembers may be separated based on the commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the commanding officer believes the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation and the offense would warrant a punitive discharge if adjudicated at trial by court-martial for the same or closely related offense. Commission of a serious offense does not require adjudication by nonjudicial or judicial proceedings or civilian conviction, however, the offense must be substantiated by a preponderance of evidence. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901887

    Original file (ND0901887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00594

    Original file (ND01-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00594 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Award: Restriction for 20 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000741

    Original file (ND1000741.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701038

    Original file (ND0701038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. The evidence supported the discharge based upon alcohol rehabilitation failure. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 200110324 - 20010827 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100720

    Original file (ND1100720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, as evidenced by his civil court conviction, his command administratively processed him for separation, which is mandatory per the Naval MilitaryPersonnel Manual (MILPERSMAN). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101457

    Original file (ND1101457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002356

    Original file (MD1002356.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Between November 1998 and June 2000, the Applicant received three NJPs, one civil arrest, and one 6105 retention warning, which included underage drinking, drunk on duty, driving while intoxicated, failure to obey orders and regulations, wrongful cohabitation with a female not his wife, and failure to pay debts and child support payments on time.Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, an Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00294

    Original file (ND01-00294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010615. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. The applicant’s service is accurately characterized as having been performed under other than honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00632

    Original file (ND02-00632.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s service record, which included a civil conviction for DUI and two NJP’s for unauthorized absence and drunk and disorderly conduct, the Board discerned there was no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant's service or the assigned reason for discharge at the time of discharge. At this time, the applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001596

    Original file (MD1001596.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...