Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400246
Original file (ND1400246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-OSSA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20131122
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20010627 - 20020625     Active:            20020626 - 20060622

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060623     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20080918      Highest Rank/Rate: OS3
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 26 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 52
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.3 ( 4 )      Behavior: 2.4 ( 5 )        OTA: 2.26

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (5) (5)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

Time Lost (per DD 214): 20030829-20040919, 21 days

NJP :

- 20080806 :      Article (Absence without leave , 8 specifications )
         Specification 1: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 1500, 20080619
         Specification 2: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0800, 20080623
         Specification 3: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0800, 20080717
         Specification 4: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 1500, 20080717
         Specification 5: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 1300, 20080714
         Specification 6: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0800, 20080728
         Specification 7: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0800, 20080729
         Specification 8: Failure to go to appointed place of duty at 0800, 20080729
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 8 specifications )
         Specification 1: Wrongfully taking and transporting classified material to his residence .
         Specification 2: Derelict in the performance of duties in that he negligently failed to report in the correct uniform .
         Specification 3: Derelict in the performance of duties in that he negligently failed to report in the correct uniform .
         Specification 4: Derelict in the performance of duties in that he willfully used personal contact information from the J3 recall bill, an official division document, to contact female members for personal reasons .
         Specification 5: Failure to obey a lawful order to check in to bachelor housing on 20080711 by failing to report at the appointed time and place .
         Specification 6: Derelict in the performance of duties in that he willfully failed to conduct himself in a professional manner by using inappropriate language and making inappropriate comments while answering the telephone on duty watch .
        
         Specification 7: Failure to obey a lawful order to be at work in uniform and with paperwork by 0915 .
         Specification 8: Failure to obey a lawful general order by wrongfully using his government travel card for unofficial non- travel related expenses .
         Article (Provoking speeches or gestures)
         Article (General A rticle - wrongfully communicating a threat )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

- 20080812 :      Article (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Disrespect toward L T by saying very loudly in a disrespectful manner to her what he “needed me to do for him” and telling her “what I had to do for him . ”
         Specification 2: Disrespect toward L T by saying in a disrespectful manner that he “should not have to walk anywhere and he should have an escort or sitter with him at all time s. ”
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
          Article (General A rticle , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Breaking restriction
         Specification 2: Wrongfully communicate a threat by saying and pointing to pictures of the junior service member of the year and the service member of the quarter “he was going to kill them or shoot them . ”
          Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20080806 :       For multiple unauthorized absences, failing to obey orders or regulations, and indecent language.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 23, effective 20 May 2008 until 9 November 2009,
Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends stress led to his misconduct.
 2.       The Applicant contends bi-polar disorder mitigates his misconduct.
3.       The Applicant contends he is innocent .
4.       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants an upgrade .

Decision

Date : 20140605             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, 8 specifications), Article 89 (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, 2 specifications), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 9 specifications), Article 117 (Provoking speeches or gestures), and Article 134 (General A rticle, 3 specifications). Based on the offense s committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to c onsult with a qualified counsel and request an administrative board but exercised his right to submit a written statement. The Applicant was notified of separation proceedings for Pattern of Misconduct and Commission of a Serious Offense .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends stress led to his misconduct. While the Applicant may feel that his stress was a contributing factor to his misconduct, it does not mitigate his disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the Naval Service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. Relief denied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends bi-polar disorder mitigates his misconduct. When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition or diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. Relief denied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he is innocent. The record of evidence clearly shows the Applicant waived his rights to trial by court-martial and an administrative separation board. If the Applicant felt he was mistakenly charged with a crime, it was his obligation to contest those charges at the time they were made. During a trial or administrative separation board, he would have had the opportunity to mount a defense against the charges. The Applicant submitted no evidence to support his contention, therefore, the NDRB must rely upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of Government affairs. Relief denied.

4 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-servi ce conduct warrants an upgrade. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement and a police incident report . The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct

establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. The Board determined the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501092

    Original file (MD1501092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200190

    Original file (MD1200190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20020801 - 20030526Active:20030527 - 20070711 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070712Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110328Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)17 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:82MOS: 4421Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102089

    Original file (MD1102089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB determined that the characterization of service should be upgraded to Honorable and the narrative reason for separation should change to Secretarial Authority. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the administrative separation process, and the Applicant’s personal testimony during Board proceedings, the Board found the discharge was inequitable at the time of discharge. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801688

    Original file (MD0801688.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600666

    Original file (ND0600666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and/or the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ HARDSHIP MEDICAL REASON.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Inactive: None Time Lost During This Period (days): Unauthorized absence: 2 days Confinement: None Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 (12-month extension) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 39 Highest Rate: SHSA Final Enlisted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001586

    Original file (ND1001586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends problems with stress mitigate his misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since fifteen years...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300369

    Original file (MD1300369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20070222 - 20070911Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070912Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100108Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:31MOS: 0121Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000076

    Original file (MD1000076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100493

    Original file (MD1100493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant did not submit any documentation along with the DD Form 293 for the Board to evaluate his post-service character and conduct. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100374

    Original file (MD1100374.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...