Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401047

Original file (MD1401047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140506

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20110706 - 20120624     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20120625     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20120717      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 55
MOS: NONE
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): NOB / NOB      Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to reenlist.
2.       The Applicant contends his reason for discharge (fraudulent Entry) is inequitable because he was not diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a child and told his recruiter he had been given Ritalin as a child.

Decision

Date: 10/01/ 20 1 4                  Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included a diagnosis by the mental health unit at the Navy Medical Center, San Diego for Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. The psychiatrist recommended the Applicant be administratively separated as the Applicant expressed suicide ideations with a vague plan of cutting himself. The Applicant was referred to the mental health unit because of his trouble breathing due to panic attacks/anxiety during entry level recruit training. Based on the Applicant’s mental health diagnosis, and recommendation of the mental health unit , command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to reenlist. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his reason for discharge (fraudulent Entry) is inequitable because he was not diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a child and told his recruiter he had been given Ritalin as a child. The Applicant was recommended for discharge by the Navy mental health unit for reason of adjustment disorder. During the psychiatrist evaluation of the Applicant, it was discovered that the Applicant was seen by a psychiatrist between the age of 12-14, and prescribed Ritalin for ADHD. The Applicant’s record does not show that he divulged his past history of ADHD and prescribed use of Ritalin during the enlistment process. Although the Applicant was recommended for discharge based on his diagnosed adjustment disorder, the Separation Authority chose to discharge the Applicant based on the primary reason of fraudulent enlistment because of his undisclosed ADHD. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s administrative separation was proper and equitable, and determined no changes were warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400435

Original file (ND1400435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY or CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20120314 - 20120923Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120924Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20121108Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 94EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400418

Original file (ND1400418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20120807 - 20130326Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20130327Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130617Highest Rank/Rate: SRLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 21 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 57EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301210

Original file (ND1301210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20100503 - 20120618Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120619Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20120719Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 41EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300945

Original file (MD1300945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Full relief to Honorable was not granted since the Applicant served only 16 days and so an Uncharacterized discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded narrative reason for separation shall change to but the characterization of service shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500780

Original file (MD1500780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling stating the Applicant is not recommended for reenlistment by reason of Fraudulent Enlistment for: Adjustment disorder; History of ADHD. During the enlistment process into the Marine Corps, the Applicant was asked to provide any medical history of counseling or treatment for a mental health condition which he denied. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00471

Original file (MD02-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant's father dated December 27, 2001 Statement from Applicant's mother dated December 27, 2001Statement from doctor dated December 12, 2001Copy of Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)Nine pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400408

Original file (ND1400408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ERRONEOUS Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20130211 - 20130922Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20130923Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20131120Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 28 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 90EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901411

Original file (ND0901411.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300498

Original file (MD1300498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500285

Original file (ND1500285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the the discovery of several disqualifying mental health conditions in his pre-enlistment medical record, none of which were disclosed during the enlistment process, command administratively processed for separation. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION)...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401047

Similar Decisions