Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400996
Original file (MD1400996.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20140422
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20080630 - 20080907     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20080908     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20120712      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 05 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 49
MOS: 0111 / 0151
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Rifle (2) (2) LoA (5)

Periods of UA / CONF :
Lost Time (per DD 214): 20111220-20111229, 10 days, 20120123-20120129, 7 days

NJP:

- 20090610 :      Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article (Assault)
         Article (General article - disorderly conduct, drunkenness)
          Awarded: Suspended:

- 20100226 :      Article (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer) 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Verbally disrespectful towards Captain
         Specification 2: Verbally disrespectful towards 2 nd Lieutenant
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20100810 :      Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer) 2 specifications
          Specification 1: Verbally disrespectful towards NCOIC
         Specification 2: Verbally disrespectful towards the Barracks Duty NCO
         Article (General article)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20120501 :      Article (Assault)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:


Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20090616 :      For violation of Article 91: On 20090523, after having received a lawful order from the OOD and DNCO for barracks 2441, to directly go to your room, willfully disobeyed the same. Violation of Article 128: On 20090523 at 0300, attempted to do bodily harm with a dangerous weapon, and swung at the face of Cpl J_ with a knife and while being restrained, cut the hand of PFC L_. Violation of Article 134.73, was drunk and disorderly when you threw a package of frozen meat at the windshield of Sgt S_’s car, busting the windshield.

- 20111104 :      For violation of Article 91 on 1730, 20110901, you were insubordinate towards a noncommissioned officer in that you raised your voice towards Sgt T_ when being counseled, and violation of Article 92 on 1730, 20110901, you failed to obey an order or regulation in that you continued to walk away while being counseled when instructed to stop and to stand by.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ ”
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps , MMSB-13, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. The Applicant contends the Marine Corps accepted him with TBI from a car accident and this condition along with family problems contributed to his misconduct.

2. The Applicant contends it was unfair to be given an Under Other Than Honorable discharge with only two months left in enlistment.
Decision


 Date: 20 1 4 0918            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 89 (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, 2 specifications) , Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer) , Article (Failure to obey order or regulation), Article (Assault), and Article (General article - disorderly conduct, drunkenness) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the Marine Corps accepted him with TBI from a car accident and this condition along with family problems contributed to his misconduct. After throrough review of the applicants records it is clearly documented that the Applicant was given proper medical evaluation prior to his separation and that competent medical authority was informed of the Applicant’s prior medical history. Per MARADMIN 328/10, The Applicant was given a medical evaluation that was reviewed prior to discharge. The medical evalustion reports that the Applicant has TBI but does not have PTSD. The record also reflects that the Applicant’s TBI did not materially have an impact on his behavior. Additionally, DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends it was unfair to be given an Under Other Than Honorable discharge with only two months left in enlistment. The Commanding Officer is allowed to consider matters for extenuation and mitigation unique to each individual. Therefore no two cases, no matter how similar, are guaranteed to receive the same punishment. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that his discharge was improper or inequitable. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.


Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000625

    Original file (MD1000625.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the administrative separation board (ASB), by a unanimous vote (3-0), they determined that the preponderance of evidence supported the act or omissions, that the Applicant should be separated from the Marine Corps and that his characterization of service should be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401024

    Original file (MD1401024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500787

    Original file (MD1500787.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201846

    Original file (MD1201846.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101377

    Original file (MD1101377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist into the Armed Forces.2. Relief denied.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300663

    Original file (MD1300663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of immaturity to be a mitigating factor or a sufficient reason for misconduct.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500648

    Original file (MD1500648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s service records, medical records, and after considering his statements and two character reference letters, the NDRB was not able to confirm a PTSD diagnosis. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401786

    Original file (MD1401786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave; 3 specifications), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct towards warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, 1 specification) Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation; 1 specification), Article 117 (Provoking speeches or gestures, 1 specifaction), and Article 128 (Assault, 3 specifications). Summary: After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401593

    Original file (MD1401593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon discharge, the Characterization of Service was determined to be General (Under Honorable Conditions) based on the Conduct mark of 3.9. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500766

    Original file (MD1500766.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the administrative separation board and Separating Authority took the Applicant’s PTSD into proper consideration in determining the Applicant’s characterization of service. After an exhaustive review, the NDRB determined that PTSD did not mitigate the Applicant’s misconduct anything beyond that already considered by the Separating Authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...