Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400981

Original file (MD1400981.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140411

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050312 - 20050619     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050620     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20091130      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 11 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 44
MOS: 0151
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 3.9 (NFIR) / 3.7 ( )          Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      Rifle LoA (2) MM (2)

NJP:

- 20070912 :       Article (Absent without leave) 3 specifications
         Specification 1: Appeared to his appointed place of duty 45 minutes late on 20070816
         Specification 2: Appeared to his appointed place of duty 100 minutes late on 20070817
         Specification 3: Appeared to his appointed place of duty 120 minutes late on 20070910
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20071012 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) 4 specifications
         Specification 1: Driving without insurance on 20071005
         Specification 2: Drinking under age on 20070916
         Specification 3: Drinking under age on 20071005
         Specification 4: Driving an unregistered vehicle on base on 20071005
         Article ( Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel , BAC 0.11 )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20071205 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Driving with suspended base driving privileges on 20071011
         Specification 2: Failed to obey order by the Battalion Commander to comply with all Marine Corps orders, policies, rules and regulations
         Awarded: Suspended: NONE

SCM:

SPCM:

- 20090319 :       Art icle (Failure to obey order or regulation, driving on base with suspension/revocation of base driving privileges)
         Art icle (Larceny and wrongful appropriation , steal $13,000 the property of the US Government )
         Sentence : CONF 8 months (20090319-20090903, 168 days) Fine of $5 , 000
         CA: Only so much of the sentence that provides for a Bad-Conduct Discharge, confinement for a period of eight (8) months, forfeiture of $933 pay per month for a period of eight (8) months and a fine of $3700 is approved and, except for the Bad-Conduct Discharge, will be executed

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20070608 :       For you r violation of Article 86, unauthorized absence in that you were absent from your appointed place of duty on 20070605 and 2007060, which resulted in your dismissal from the Rifle Range

- 20070813 :       For poor judgment and attention to duty, specifically in violation of Article 92, in that on 20070807, while traveling aboard Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune. SNM failed to adhere to the posted speed limit as a result was cited by the base military police for speeding. SNM was cited for traveling 49/35 MPH zone

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant implies his post-service conduct warrants clemency.

Decision

Date: 20140918 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant's clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absent without leave, 3 specifications), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 6 specifications), and Article 111 (Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel) ; and for of the UCMJ: Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article 121 (Larceny and wrongful appropriation, steal $13,000 the property of the US Government). Under advice of counsel, t he Applicant submitted a pre-trial agreement to plead guilty in order to have the charges and specifications referred to a SPCM vice a general court-martial (GCM). The Applicant w as convicted at a SPCM and was separated from the Marine Corps with a Bad Conduct discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant implies his post-service conduct warrants clemency. T he Applicant provide one character referen c e on his behalf for post-service consideration. To warrant clemency, the Applicant’s post-service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s post-service effort does not warrant clemency. Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100184

Original file (ND1100184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for educational benefits.2. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s medications were in no way related to the serious misconduct for which he was separated. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301796

Original file (MD1301796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300505

Original file (MD1300505.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901049

Original file (ND0901049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, per his DD Form 214, the Applicant was subsequently discharged based on the commission of a serious offense, given a separation code of HKQ indicating he waived his right to an administrative separation board and assigned an Other Than Honorable Discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000848

Original file (ND1000848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, recordentries and administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801759

Original file (ND0801759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990329 - 19990824 Active: 19990825 - 20030424 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030425Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20071005Length of Service: Years Months11 Days Education Level: Age at Enlistment: AFQT: 55Highest Rank/Rate: SK3 Evaluation Marks: Performance: 3.8 (5) Behavior: 2.6 (5) OTA: 3.40Awards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500052

Original file (ND1500052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301481

Original file (MD1301481.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Before his extended period of unauthorized absence he had already met the requirements for administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense) and Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801161

Original file (MD0801161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Articles 86, 90, 92, and 128. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process,...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400738

Original file (ND1400738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. With two NJPs for violations of UCMJ Articles 86, 92, and 107 in two years of service, the Applicant met the requirements to be administratively separated for Misconduct (Serious Offense), and the NDRB determined his discharge was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400981

Similar Decisions