Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400700

Original file (MD1400700.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140307

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20091001 - 20100801     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20100802     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20131203      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 31
MOS: 3531
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      Rifle ACM LoA

Periods of UA / CONF : UA: 20130 415 -20130 510 , 26 days ; 20130819-20130822, 4 days / CONF: NFIR

NJP:

- 20130515 :       Article (Absence without leave , 0730, 20130415 - 1414, 20130511, 26 days)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Details NFIR Suspended: Details NFIR [Date extracted from supporting documents submitted by the A pplicant] [Articles extracted from NAVMC 11B(11), Administrative Remarks dated 20130515]

- 20 1 30607 :       Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20130813 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Wrongfully wearing civilian attire
         Specification 2: Wrongfully going to the Country Store and purchasing non-hygiene items
         Awarded: Suspended: Suspension vacated 20130828

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20130515 :       For violation of Article s 86 and 92.

- 20130813 :       For violation of two specifications of Article 92 .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MISCONDUCT ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps , MMSB-13, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

                  Types of Documents Submitted /reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends post - combat deployment stress led to his misconduct.
2 .       The Applicant contends personal issues led to his misconduct.

Decision

Date: 20140710          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

As a result of the Applicant’s claim of post-combat stress, in accordance with U.S. Code, Title X, Section 1553 (d)(1), the Naval Discharge Review Board included a member who is a physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist. In accordance with section 1553 (d)(2), the service secretary expedited a final decision and accorded the case sufficient priority to achieve an expedited resolution. The Applicant’s records document completion of a deployment to Afghanistan from October 2011 to March 2012 , conducting combat service support operations in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM.

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, 26 days) and Article 92 (Failu re to obey order or regulation, 4 specifications). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review . However, the Applicant has a separation code of HKA1 on his DD Form 214, which indicates he waived his administrative board. In addition, the Applicant submitted documents that implied he submitted a pre-trial agreement to accept and plead guilty at his third NJP and waive his administrative separation board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends post - combat deployment stress led to his misconduct. The medical record shows the Applicant was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with disturbance of emotions and conduct following his deployment to Afghanistan . The medical record also shows the Applicant had P ost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (P TSD ) symptoms and was diagnosed with Military Combat Stress reaction. In determining discharge characterization of service, the Applicant’s conduct forms the primary basis for consideration. The Applicant’s in-service conduct included three NJPs , which were willful failures to meet the requirements of his contract honorably. The Applicant’s medical record supports his contention that he was experiencing mental health issues while in service . However, t he evidence of record d oes not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The evidence of record does show that the Applicant was receiving medical care from competent medical authorities and was being treated for his symptoms. Going UA for 26 days and persistently breaking restriction were conscious decisions to violate the ten ets of honorable and faithful service. After an exhaustive review, the NDRB determined PTSD and post-combat deployment stress did not mitigate the Applicant’s misconduct , and his discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable . Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends personal issues led to his misconduct. While the Applicant may feel that his personal issues were a contributing factor to his misconduct, they do not mitigate his disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the Marine Corps , demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500061

Original file (ND1500061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (CIVIL CONVICTION). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500968

Original file (MD1500968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

I understand that waiving my right to an administrative discharge board will likely result in my receiving a discharge Under Other Than Honorable conditions from the Marine Corps.” Regarding the above statement of rights, the NDRB found that the Applicant was not discharged for commission of a serious offense due to his period of unauthorized absence, but for pleading guilty at Summary Court-Martial for Article 87 (Missing movement). Summary: After a thorough review of the available...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301247

Original file (ND1301247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends he was improperly discharged from the Navy Reserve. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service includedan administrative discharge from the Navy Reserve on 18 January 2005 with a...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301245

Original file (ND1301245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to reenlist.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301575

Original file (ND1301575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined PTSD and other mental health issues did not mitigate his misconduct, and his discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since 15 years have elapsed since the date of his discharge,...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401182

Original file (ND1401182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PATERN OF MISCONDUCT. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300151

Original file (ND1300151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301194

Original file (ND1301194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change to her separation code so she can reenlist into the Army National Guard.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300297

Original file (MD1300297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post-service, the Applicant applied for clemency to the Naval Discharge Review Board, which granted an upgrade in the characterization of service to Under Other Than Honorable Conditions in September 2011.: (Decisional) () . Full relief to Honorable was not granted, because the Applicant had misconduct and was responsible for his actions.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, testimony, record entries, and discharge...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200607

Original file (MD1200607.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Issue 5: (Decisional) () .The Applicant contends his record of service, specifically his three deployments, warrants consideration for upgrading his discharge.Despite a service member’s record of service, to include combat service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Marine Corps to maintain proper order and discipline. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400700

Similar Decisions