Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400492
Original file (MD1400492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20140117
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to: OR
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19981208 - 19990120     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19990121     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20020610      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 43
MOS: 3043
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      Rifle

NJP:

- 20001002 :       Article (Absence without leave , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: 1500, 20000804-1400, 20000809, 5 days
         Specification 2: Failed to report at the time prescribed to a Regimental Hike at 0430 on 20000815
         Article ( Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     CC:

SPCM:

- 20010209 :       Art icle (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances , 4 specifications )
         Specification 1: Did at Camp Lejeune, NC, between about 20001106-20001121, wrongfully use marijuana.
         Specification 2: Did at Camp Lejeune, NC, between about 20001211-20001221, wrongfully use cocaine.
         Specification 3: Did at Camp Lejeune, NC, between about 20001208-20001221, wrongfully use marijuana.
         Specification 4: Did at Camp Lejeune, NC, on or about 20001221, wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana.
          Sentence : 90 days (20001221-20010208, 50 days)

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20000629 :       For the following deficiencies: SNM absented himself from regt. a-duty without proper authority.

- 20001002 :       For the following deficiencies: SNM was repeatedly UA from his work section and training evolutions and violated the out - of - bounds order.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks clemency for service benefits.
2. The Applicant contends his misconduct was the result of poor leadership and was an isolated inc ident.
 3 .       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants clemency.

Decision

 Date: 20 1 4 0710           Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Co de of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, 2 specifications) and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 1 specification) , and for of the UCMJ: Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances, 4 specifications). The Applicant acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 3 D ecember 1998. The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 9 February 2001. A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process. Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge, forfeiture of $ 600 pay per month for one month , reduction to pay grade E-1 , an d confinement for a period of 90 days. The C onvening A uthority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended all confinem ent in excess of time served (60 days). The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals without assignments of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed on 10 June 2002.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks clemency for service benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his misconduct was the result of poor leadership and was an isolated incident. During the Applicant’s 3 years and 4 months of service, which included 16 months on appellate leave, he had two retention warnings, was found guilty at an NJP of violating UCMJ Articles 86 and 92, and was found guilty at a Special Court-Martial of four violations of UCMJ Article 112a. Despite repeated efforts by his leadership to correct his poor behavior, the Applicant continued to engage in misconduct that eventually resulted in a Special Court-Martial conviction and a punitive Bad Conduct Discharge. The NDRB determined clemency was not warranted. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants clemency. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a college transcript. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable

discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. The Board determined the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801188

    Original file (ND0801188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined based on the limited documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate and the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the limited time served and the UCMJ violations involved. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601047

    Original file (MD0601047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020410Basis for Discharge: MISCONDUCT, COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSELeast Favorable Characterization: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020411Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Recommendation of Commanding Officer...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601226

    Original file (MD0601226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 20031008: Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune, NC: Applicant present for ETOH evaluation. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified: 20031114 Basis for Discharge: CONDITION NOT A DISABILITYLeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20031125Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401583

    Original file (MD1401583.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or petty officer), Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), and Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances); and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Absent without leave, 5 specifications) Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), and Article 128...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400638

    Original file (MD1400638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100685

    Original file (MD1100685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:DISCRETION OF THE NDRB Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active:NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19980618Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months [6x2 ROEP]Date of Discharge:20050414Highest Rank:Length of Service:Inactive: Year(s)Month(s)04 Day(s)Active: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s) Appellate Leave: Year(s)Month(s)23 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:64MOS:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01270

    Original file (MD02-01270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950223 - 950321 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950322 Date of Discharge: 990315 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 11 24 (Excludes lost time, confinement time and appellate leave.) PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19990315 with a bad conduct discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400090

    Original file (ND1400090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was too harsh and disproportionate to his minor misconduct.2. As full relief was granted to the Applicant under Issue 1, the NDRB did not consider this issue.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300670

    Original file (MD1300670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 May 2011, an Administrative Separation Board convened and determined by a vote of 3-0 that a preponderance of the evidence supported that the Applicant committed a pattern of misconduct, that the Applicant should be administratively separated, and that the characterization of service should be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300255

    Original file (MD1300255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the...