Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301883

Original file (ND1301883.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AOAN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130930

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20051214 - 20060313     Active:

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060314     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100302      Highest Rank/Rate: AO3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 46
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.4 ( 5 )      Behavior: 2.8 ( 5 )        OTA: 3.33

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:

- 20100206 :      Article (False official statement , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Did on board U.S. Navy ship at sea, on or about 20091112, with the intent to deceive, make to a Special Agent Naval Criminal Investigative Service, an official statement, to wit: “I have no knowledge of AOAA, U.S. Navy, ever using or selling steroids. I have never used or purchased steroids , ” or words to that effect, which statement was totally false, and was then known by said member to be so false.
         Specification 2: Did on board U.S. Navy ship at sea, on or about 20100121, with the intent to deceive, make to a Special Agent Naval Criminal Investigative Service, an official statement, to wit: “I don’t know why my urinalyses would have come back positive for steroids,” or words to that effect, which statement was totally false, and was then known by said member to be so false.
         Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances ; Did on divers e occasions from on or about September 2009 to on or about November 2009, wrongfully use anabolic androgenic ster oids , a S chedule III controlled substance. )
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant would like an upgrade for employment and education opportunities.
2 .       The Applicant contends he was an outstanding Sailor for four years who had never been in trouble before, his job as an AO was very physically demanding and he only used the steroids to meet the physical requirements of the rate, and he fully admitted to his guilt and took the repercussions.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0410             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( False official statement , ) and Article ( Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances , ) . Th e Applicant a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant right to submit a written statement but rights to consult with a qualified coun sel and request a n administrative board.

Issue 1: (Nondecisional) The Applicant would like an upgrade for employment and education opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was an outstanding Sailor for four years who had never been in trouble before, his job as an AO was very physically demanding and he only used the steroids to meet the physical requirements of the rate, and he fully admitted to his guilt and took the repercussions. Many servicemembers are placed in physically demanding jobs and still adhere to the policies and standards of the Nav y . The Nav y has a clear zero - tolerance drug policy . Certain serious offenses warrant separation from the service to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade , performance, or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The Applicant, however, did not just violate Article 112a but also violated Article 107 when he lied about his steroid use during two separate interviews with NCIS agents. Ultimately, t he command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801416

Original file (MD0801416.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion :().The Applicant is seeing an upgrade to his discharge characterization since his discharge for drug abuse was a result of a Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) interview and not based on a positive urinalysis. In accordance with Marine Corps policy, all Marines (regardless of pay grade) are processed for administrative separation by reason of misconduct, due to drug abuse on the first offense.All board...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901365

Original file (MD0901365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Further, the record reflects willful misconduct, that the Applicant was responsible for his behavior at the time of the offenses and had no potential for further service.The NDRB determined that the Applicant's youth and immaturity was not a mitigating factor in his misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902194

Original file (MD0902194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901356

Original file (MD0901356.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of 3-0, an administrative discharge board found that the Applicant had committed misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation and that the Applicant’s discharge characterization should be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The record reflects that the Applicant’s administrative separation board was conducted in accordance with Marine Corps’ policies and standards.The NDRB advises the Applicant that certain serious offenses warrant separation from the service in order...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901595

Original file (MD0901595.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19930526 - 19931003Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19931004Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19951218Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)14 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:55MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100281

Original file (MD1100281.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge.However, based on Applicant and witness testimony, and the evidence presented at the hearing, the awarded...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100346

Original file (ND1100346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901891

Original file (MD0901891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident in an otherwise unblemished record of service.The NDRB advises the Applicant despite a service member’s prior record of service certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Marine Corps in order to maintain proper order and discipline.Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade or time in service. The NDRB determined...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300098

Original file (MD1300098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. : (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to reenlist.Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902622

Original file (ND0902622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Since the NDRB is not an...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301883

Similar Decisions