Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301715

Original file (ND1301715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MASA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130815

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020128 - 20020210     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20020211     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20040108      Highest Rank/Rate: MASN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.00

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20031031 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Article 134 (General A rticle, disorderly conduct)
         Awarded: NFIR Suspended: NFIR

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20031031 :       For CO’s NJP of 20031031 for violation of UCMJ Article 86 ( U nauthorized absence), Article 92 ( F ailure to obey order or regulations), and Article 134 ( D isorderly conduct)

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant contends his record warrants a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge.
2.       The Applicant contends he was offered the opportunity to stay in the Navy and take orders to Bahrain , therefore, he believes his record was not Other Than Honorable.
3.       The Applicant contends his post-service attendance at college warrants consideration for an upgrade of his discharge.

Decision

Date : 20 1 4 032 0             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propri ety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation ), Article 86 ( Absence without leave ), and Article 134 ( General A rticle, disorderly conduct ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his record warrants a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. The Applicant’s record was incomplete, and the specifics of the offenses committed by the Applicant were not available to the NDRB. However, violation of Article 92 is considered a serious offense and warrants a referral to a S pecial or G eneral C ourt- M artial that could result in a Bad Conduct or Dishonorable Discharge. Since t he Applicant was administratively separated and not separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation , t he characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. The Applicant provided no evidence, other than his statements, to overcome the presumption of regularity , therefore, the NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable as issued. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was offered the opportunity to stay in the Navy and take orders to Bahrain , therefore, he believes his record was not Other Than Honorable. The Applicant submitted no evidence to the NDRB to substantiate his claims that he was offered the opportunity to stay in the Navy and accept orders to Bahrain . What is likely is that the Applicant had been offered orders to Bahrain but subsequent misconduct on his part led his command to determine that he was no longer fit to serve, and he was processed for administrative separation. Although the Applicant’s administrative separation package was not available for the NDRB to review, the Applicant’s separation code of HKA on his DD Form 214 indicates he waived his right to an administrative board where he would have had the opportunity to ask to be retained in the Navy or to argue his case for a more favorable discharge characterization of service. The NDRB determined that a preponderance of evidence supports the Government in this case, and the Applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable as issued. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service attendance at college warrants consideration for an upgrade of his discharge. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law, or regulation, that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he failed to provide any documentary evidence on his behalf for post-service consideration. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum with the recognition that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. Without post-service documentary evidence, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400294

Original file (ND1400294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301557

Original file (ND1301557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants an upgrade for employment opportunities.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601091

Original file (ND0601091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Narrative reason change: Commander Naval Personnel directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse after reviewing the administrative discharge package forwarded by U. S. Naval Security Force, Bahrain. The record documents his administrative discharge board and commanding officer’s recommendation for separation by reason of misconduct by drug abuse with a characterization of service as under other than...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000975

Original file (ND1000975.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100828

Original file (ND1100828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Admin Board proceeding was held on 21 March 2010.On 22 Mar 2010, the Applicant’s Defense Counsel submitted a Letter of Deficiency to the Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity (NSA) Bahrain requesting the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service. Since an administrative discharge is not punishment, the decision to administratively discharge a service member is made independently of and does not require adjudication at court-martial or...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902342

Original file (MD0902342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After consideration of all available documentation to include the Applicant’s enlistment waiver for self-admitted drug use (marijuana use, 1 time), the lack of appeal requests or rebuttal statements by the Applicant, and the decision to waive his right to an administrative separation board, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of government affairs and found the Applicant did not provide sufficient, credible evidence to the contrary.Issue 4:(Decisional) () . The Applicant should be...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902037

Original file (ND0902037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020531 - 20020820Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20020821Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20031031Highest Rank/Rate: SHSALength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)11 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 42EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.0(1)OTA: 3.0Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301361

Original file (ND1301361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist into the Armed Forces.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200127

Original file (ND1200127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, testimony, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant is not eligible for further review from the NDRB. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900401

Original file (MD0900401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

2.Record of service. The NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable,” was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violation involved.Should the Applicant obtain additional evidence or post-servicedocumentation she may wish to apply for a personal appearance.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301715

Similar Decisions