AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00087
SIGNATURE OF RECORDER SIGNALURE OF BOARD PRESIDEN SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CO’ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°° FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be t AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp93.0087 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The characterization of the...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002313
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Nondecisional Issues: The Applicant seeks clemency in the form of an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to facilitate reenlistment in the armed forces.Decisional Issues: The Applicant seeks clemency in the form of an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge to at least General (Under Honorable Conditions), contending that he was...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002351
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002095
Due to the serious, repeated nature of the Applicant’s misconduct, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000308
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Though the Applicant’s administrative separation package was not available for the Board’s review, the DD-214 did list “Personality Disorder” as the Narrative Reason for Separation in Block 28, which was congruent with the documents contained within the Applicant’s medical records and in accordance with the applicable sections within the U.S. Navy Military Personnel Manual...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600263
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ex-FN, USNDocket No. APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application: “ I was discharged 5 months and 12 days into service due to what the Navy doctor classified as a “personality disorder.” I was released from my duty station 18 days before my 6 month “ anniversary”. in Biblical Studies.” While there is no law or...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801631
Supporting documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s or other financial institutions; documentation of a drug free lifestyle; continued higher education and character witness statements.The Applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03096-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062119C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant had more than 19 days of creditable active service. Although he entered active service on 19 January 1973 and was discharged on 24 September 1974, most of this period was noncreditable time spent in the hospital due to injuries incurred as a result of his misconduct, pre-trial confinement, AWOL, or excess leave.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901076
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Board opined that the command’s pursuit of a discharge for the Applicant based on the suicidal gestures he displayed when he cut himself, consumed pills and threatened to hurt himself was reasonable, appropriate and supported by a medical diagnosis by a qualified provider.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...