Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300786

Original file (ND1300786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LSSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130211

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       MEDICAL

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20080320 - 20080626     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080627     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20120326      Highest Rank/Rate: LSSN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 00 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 57
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.8 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.8 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.09

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant contends mental health issues, which were caused by his military service, mitigate his misconduct.
2 .       The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation should be changed to “ M edical . ”
3 .       The Applicant contends his in-service performance and conduct up until he began suffering from mental health problems warrant an upgrade .

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 1030             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety.
The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. However, the Applicant was processed for administrative separation by reason of commission of a serious offense, Spice use. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . The administrative board, by a vote of 3 to 0, determined the preponderance of evidence support ed t he Applicant’s separation by reason of commission of a serious offense, Spice use, and recommended the Applicant be separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends mental health issues, which were caused by his military service, mitigate his misconduct. T he Applicant submitted medical document ation , dated 05 March 2012 , that indicates he was diagnosed with Bipolar I D isorder . Following the Applicant’s separation, he received a diagnosis of psychotic disorder not otherwise specified versus bipolar disorder and Schizophrenia (paranoid type) . When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition or diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held acco untable fo r his actions. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation should be changed to “ M edical . ” D epartment of Defense disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons , such as medical . Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his in-service performance and conduct up until he began suffering from mental health problems warrant an upgrade. Violation of the Navy ’s Drug Policy is an offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade, performance, or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. However, his command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. The NDRB found the Applicant’s discharge was equitable and consistent with the characterization given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 18 August 2011 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400851

Original file (MD1400851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: MEDICAL DISCHARGE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20080501 - 20080907Active:Pre-Service Drug Waiver: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080908Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110706Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)26 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:47MOS: 1345Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101434

Original file (ND1101434.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends Spice was not illegal to be sold in retail at the time of his discharge. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges,...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300722

Original file (ND1300722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends he was not provided a fair and impartial hearing during his Administrative Separation Board.The NDRB conducted a complete review of his service record, to include his lawyer’s Letter of Deficiency submitted after his admin board, and found that he was provided full due process during the administrative separation process, and he received a fair and impartial hearing at his Administrative Separation Board. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401477

Original file (ND1401477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was diagnosed by mental health specialists with an Adjustment disorder with depressed mood while in service in the Navy; however, the Applicant was administratively processed for discharge from the Navy after he was found guilty at NJP for violation of orders prohibiting the use of a controlled substance, specifically Spice. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301238

Original file (ND1301238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using drugs prior to entering the Navy.Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory.When notified of administrative separation processing for Misconduct (Serious Offense), Misconduct (Drug Abuse), and Physical Fitness Assessment Failure using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board. ” Additional Reviews :...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201015

Original file (ND1201015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for G.I. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102143

Original file (MD1102143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501118

Original file (MD1501118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An Administrative Separation Board was convened on 28 May 2013 and determined by unanimous vote (3-0) that a preponderance of evidenced supported the Applicant’s drug possession, and recommended the Applicant be discharged from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for reason of Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401037

Original file (ND1401037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge should be changed to General, and the narrative reason for discharge shall remain as issued. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201345

Original file (ND1201345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300786

Similar Decisions