Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300491

Original file (ND1300491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130107

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20110104 - 20110425     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20110426     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20120504      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 09 D a ys
Education Level: +       AFQT: 75
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.84

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20111206 :      Article (Absence without leave, from 0700, 14 November 2011 until 1630, 14 November 2011)
         Article (False official statements)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20120412 :      Article (Absence without leave , 7 specifications )
         Specification 1: on or about 1730, 29 Mar ch 20 12, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 2: on or about 1730, 21 March 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 3: on or about 1730, 13 March 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 4: on or about 1730, 12 March 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 5: on or about 1730, 11 March 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 6: on or about 1730, 1 March 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Specification 7: on or about 1730, 29 February 2012, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: LS mandatory night study
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :          SPCM:          C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20111020 :       For Physical Fitness A ssessment failure

- 20111206 :       For violations of the UCMJ, Article 86 and Article 107; reference NJP dated 20111206.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks a change in his reentry (RE) code to RE-3A.
2.       The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because the significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty did not outweigh the positive a spects of his military record.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0912             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, 8 specifications) and Article 107 ( False official statements ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to co nsult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement, but exercised his right to request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his reentry (RE) code to RE-3A. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is in equitable , because the significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty did not outweigh the positive aspects of his military record. The characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. Other considerations shall be given to the member’s length of service, grade, aptitude, and physical and mental condition. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, which included two retention warnings and two NJPs during 12 months of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400641

Original file (ND1400641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant contends his narrative reason is not justified.In accordance with Naval Military Personnel Manual Article 1910-140, a member may be separated by reason of a Pattern of Misconduct when during the current enlistment they havetwo or more NJPs and violated a NAVPERS 1070/613 prior to processing. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted,...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300369

Original file (MD1300369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20070222 - 20070911Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070912Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100108Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:31MOS: 0121Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00529

Original file (ND01-00529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND01-00529 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant recommended for administrative separation from active naval service with a general discharge. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).A characterization of service of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901342

Original file (ND0901342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00712

Original file (ND02-00712.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND02-00712 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020429, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Please consider my request open-minded because there were more circumstances than are listed on my service records. Violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault on another person on 890911.
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00489

Original file (ND02-00489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND02-00489 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020305, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 920430: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Did on or about 910919, without authority, absent himself from his unit, to wit: USS INDEPENDENCE located at Yokosuka, Japan, and did remain so absent until apprehended on or about 920309 (142...
USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00074

Original file (MD01-00074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. 980226: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failed to obey a order given by LtCol S____, Commanding Officer, to remain in barracks until the next work day. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501307

Original file (ND0501307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After serving my restriction time I was scheduled for a medical discharge (Honorable) yet I was given a discharge of other than Honorable. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600761

Original file (MD0600761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). ], Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and discharge warning issued .050606: Commanding Officer, Combat Service Support Battalion-1 recommended that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable characterization by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.050630: NJP for violation of...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200380

Original file (ND1200380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

of controlled substances) Article (Debt, dishonorably failing to pay)SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300491

Similar Decisions