Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300001

Original file (ND1300001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120927

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20090206 - 20090719     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20090720     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20120110      Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 21 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.3 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.46

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20111012 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: By wrongfully being outside of his hotel/accommodation after the expiration of liberty
         Specification 2: By wrongfully failing to produce his U.S. military identification card when requested by Korean police
         Specification 3: By wrongfully consuming alcohol while under the age of 21
         Article (Larceny , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Steal 116,000 Korean Won currency, value of approximately $100.00 U.S. currency
         Specification 2: Steal two cellular phones
         Article (General A rticle - Drunk and disorderly conduct)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends he served honorably , his discharge was based on an incident that should have been treated as a first-time, alcohol - related incident , and he was never offered counseling or treatment .

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0613 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and proprie ty. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications: [1] By wrongfully being outside of his hotel/accommodation after the expiration of liberty; [2] By wrongfully failing to produce his U.S. military identification card when requested by Korean police; [3] By wrongfully consuming alcohol while under the age of 21), Article (Larceny, 2 specifications : [1] Steal 116,000 Korean Won currency, value of approximately $100.00 U.S. currency; [2] Steal two cellular phones) , and Article (General A rticle - d runk and disorderly conduct). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he served honorably, his discharge was based on an incident that should have been treated as a first-time, alcohol-related incident, and he was never offered counseling or treatment. It is the commanding officer’s determination as to how to adjudicate offenses. The Applicant was found guilty of violating UCMJ Articles 92, 121, and 134 at NJP. Violation of Articles 92 and 121 are considered serious offenses that could have resulted in a punitive discharge (i.e., Bad Conduct) as the result of a Special Court-Martial. Subsequent to his NJP, his commanding officer determined that he was no longer fit to serv e and made the following comments in his recommendation to administratively separate the Applicant: “Airman Apprentice [Applicant] had a major lapse in judgment while in port Pusan, South Korea. His theft of money and cell phones from two South Korean nationals was not in line with the standards that must be upheld by every U.S. Navy Sailor. While his actions rate dismissal from the Naval Service, his time with this command in every other regard has been above average, both before and after his Non-Judicial Punishment.” The Applicant was administratively separated and not separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation. The characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. Other considerations shall be given to the member’s length of service, grade, aptitude, and physical and mental condition. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was warranted, and he received an Under Honorable Conditions (General) discharge because of his positive record outside of the isolated incident. The misconduct against foreign nationals typically would have resulted in an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. The NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable. As to counseling and treatment, appropriate treatment is supposed to be offered if the Applicant is determined to be drug or alcohol dependent. The purpose of this treatment is not to rehabilitate a service member for further service but rather to provi de treatment before separation. While unclear from the record as to whether he received treatment, the lack of treatment prior to discharge does not change the propriety or equity of his discharge. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 18 August 2011 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 121 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01027

Original file (MD03-01027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD03-01027 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030516. As a result of the situation, this caused a blemish on my criminal history and as you can see it shows a criminal record from Washington, DC. The Applicant's misconduct is clearly documented.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902383

Original file (MD0902383.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600850

Original file (MD0600850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) (2)Letter from Applicant, dtd March 27, 2006 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19891219 - 19900204 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19900205 Date of Discharge: 19960701 Length of Service (years, months,...
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01019

Original file (MD03-01019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD03-01019 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030516. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member-1, State VA-6 copy) Applicant’s Awards (5 pages) Applicant’s Combat History page...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00090

Original file (ND02-00090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

With this discharge there in nothing I can do for them or myself. 010123: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct as evidenced by NJP held on 000725 and a foreign civil conviction of 001205 during current enlistment, misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by NJP held on 000725 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121, larceny of two debit check cards and wrongfully obtaining...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001693

Original file (AR20090001693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102168

Original file (ND1102168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade due to passage of time.2. The NDRB acknowledges the Applicant’s desire to provide a better life for himself and his family, however, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801688

Original file (MD0801688.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500784

Original file (MD1500784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01100

Original file (MD01-01100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 921113 - 930616 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930617 Date of Discharge: 980225 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 04 07 08 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300001

Similar Decisions