Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301486

Original file (MD1301486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130731

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20031103 - 20031116     Active: 20031117 - 20071116 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20090803     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20111102      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 32
MOS: 2111
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol ( 3 ) (2) CoA (2) CoC

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

- 20100628 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20110120 :       Article 80 (Attempts)
         Article (False official statement)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20091112 :       For operation of a POV with a suspended license, specifically , being detained aboard Aberdeen Proving Ground by PMO on 20091108 for operating POV with a suspended license.

- 20100329 :       For your lack of professionalism and unsatisfactory conduct as a NCO, specifically , by failing to be at your appointed place of duty on numerous occasions, while attending the MDSS II/MAGTAF Load Planning Course and your failure to complete major assignment to complete the course. Your UAs, lackadaisical attitude , and substandard performance caused your dismissal from the course. The dismissal adversely affected the mission capability of the Inspector Instructor Staff and Bravo Company, 4 ^TH AABN and showed a lacked of commitment to your fellow Marines. Your actions are in complete conflict with our core values of Honor, Courage , and Commitment and are unacceptable for a n NCO of Marines.

- 20100628 :       For company level NJP for violation of Article 92, dereliction of duty by failing to inventory returned ordnance items, specifically , the security ammunition from an outside command who temp loaned the items. Your lackadaisical attitude toward proper armory procedures resulting in the loss of 5 rounds demonstrates an attitude that is in complete conflict with our core values of Honor, Courage , and Commitment and are unacceptable for a n NCO of Marines.

- 20101214 :       For entering into the a rmory on 20101207 with the intent of breaking into the armory without proper authorization, and by picking the lock to the armory with a wire hanger. On 20101208 you were asked by 1STSGT B_ how you entered into the armory and did you not use a wire hanger to pick the lock , which you confessed to using later. Your actions are in complete conflict with our core values of Honor, Courage , and Commitment and are unacceptable for a n NCO of Marines.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because it was not imposed at his nonjudicial punishment ( NJP ) .
2.       The Applicant contends youth and immaturity were contributing factors in his misconduct , and he was only trying to do the right thing.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0212          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 80 ( Attempts ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation ), and Article 107 ( False official statements ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercis ed rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative board . The Applicant’s administrative board determined by a vote of 3-0 that the preponderance of the evidence proved all of the acts or omissions alleged in the notification, that separation was warranted, that the separation should not be suspended, that he not be retained in the I ndividual R eady R eserve, and that the characterization of his service should be General (Under Honorable Conditions). The Separation Authority concurred with the recommendations and discharged the Applicant with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization for a Pattern of Misconduct.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable, because it was not imposed at his nonjudicial punishment (NJP). After receiving four retention warnings and being found guilty of several UCMJ violations at two NJPs, his command determined he was no longer fit to serve and processed him for administrative separation. The decision to administratively separate a servicemember is made independently of the imposition of NJP. The NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends youth and immaturity were contributing factors in his misconduct , and he was only trying to do the right thing. While the Applicant may feel his youth and immaturity were the underlying causes of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB recognizes that many of our servicemembers are young at the time they enlist for service, however, the Applicant was in his second enlistment and was fully aware of regulations and orders in the Marine Corps. While some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of immaturity to be a mitigating factor or a sufficient reason for misconduct. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902342

Original file (MD0902342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After consideration of all available documentation to include the Applicant’s enlistment waiver for self-admitted drug use (marijuana use, 1 time), the lack of appeal requests or rebuttal statements by the Applicant, and the decision to waive his right to an administrative separation board, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of government affairs and found the Applicant did not provide sufficient, credible evidence to the contrary.Issue 4:(Decisional) () . The Applicant should be...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00832

Original file (MD04-00832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

________________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.021206: Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Corporal...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401402

Original file (MD1401402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000080

Original file (MD1000080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, and discharge process, the NDRB determined Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501266

Original file (MD0501266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Private F_(Applicant)’s chain of command recommends that he be separated from the Marine Corps. Indeed, the Applicant’s records contain: • Counseling entry on 20010529 for unauthorized absence; • Summary Court Martial conviction on 20020629 for violation of UCMJ Article 86 Unauthorized absence from 20020206 to 20020604 (118 days); • Retention warning entry on 20020722...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000413

Original file (MD1000413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. After considering all the available documentary evidence, the Board determined this issue did not provide a basis for which relief could be granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and punitive discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002049

Original file (MD1002049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19990123 - 19990222Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19990223Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19991103Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)12 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:49MOS: 6051Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000182

Original file (MD1000182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s pre-service waiver; written acknowledgment of the Marine Corps Policy for Drug Abuse; his Summary of Service; Service Record Entries; the Summary Record of Trial by Special Court-Martial; and the personal statement of the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301872

Original file (MD1301872.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101368

Original file (ND1101368.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation board.The Applicant was separated from the Navy on 2 December 2009 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Pattern of Misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301486

Similar Decisions