Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201733
Original file (ND1201733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PCSR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120813
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      
        
Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19950606 - 19950807     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 1995080 8     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 1 9980817      Highest Rank/Rate: PCSN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth 10 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 48
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.00

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      ( 2 )

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 19970722 :      Article (Assault , 4 specifications )
         Specification 1: SNM, on or about 19970520, unlawfully grabbed his wife, _____, by the hair, pulled her from the vehicle, and dragged her on the ground, at which time he hit her head on a concrete wall several times.
         Specification 2: SNM, on or about 19970530, unlawfully slapped his wife, _____, on her facial area and while she was trying to exit the vehicle, he grabbed the backpack she was wearing and held her by the arm.
         Specification 3: SNM, on or about 19970612, unlawfully pushed his wife, _____, against the door resulting in her lower back hitting the door knob, and hitting and slapping her on the head area several times.
         Specification 4: SNM, on or about 19970706, unlawfully pushed his wife, _____, several times and slammed the closet door on her fingers.
         Article (General A rticle - T hreat, communicating , 2 specification s)
         Specification 1: SNM did, on or about 19970520, wrongfully communicate to his wife, _____, a threat by stating, “If you call Security , it will get worse,” or words to that effect.
         Specification 2: SNM did, on or about 19970706, wrongfully communicate to his wife, _____, a threat by stating, “If you go to Security once again, I might as well beat you up,” or words to that effect.
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated on 19980128.

- 19980121 :      Article (General A rticle - D isorderly conduct)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :            SPCM:            C C :



Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19970722 :       For your appearance at nonjudicial punishment on 19970722 for violating the UCMJ, Articles 128 (4 specs) and 134 (2 specs).

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 December 1997 until 29 March 2000, Article 1910-142, Separation By Reason Of Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 128 and 134 .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable, because he was never charge d or convicted of any wrong doing in the post office .
Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0521             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Assault, 4 specifications: 1 ) SNM, on or about 19970520, unlawfully grabbed his wife, _____, by the hair, pulled her from the vehicle, and dragged her on the ground, at which time he hit her head on a concrete wall several times; 2 ) SNM, on or about 19970530, unlawfully slapped his wife, _____, on her facial area and while she was trying to exit the vehicle, he grabbed the backpack she was wearing and held her by the arm; 3 ) SNM, on or about 19970612, unlawfully pushed his wife, _____, against the door resulting in her lower back hitting the door knob, and hitting and slapping her on the head area several times; 4 ) SNM, on or about 19970706, unlawfully pushed his wife, _____, several times and slammed the closet door on her fingers) and Article (General A rticle - T hreat, communicating , 2 specification s : 1 ) SNM did, on or about 19970520, wrongfully communicate to his wife, _____, a threat by stating, “If you call Security , it will get worse,” or words to that effect; 2 ) SNM did, on or about 19970706, wrongfully communicate to his wife, _____, a threat by stating, “If you go to Security once again, I might as well beat you up,” or words to that effect) , and Article (General A rticle - D isorderly conduct) . Based on the offense s committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable, because he was never charged or convicted of any wrong doing in the post office. Per the Naval Military Personnel Manual, a servicemember may be processed for separation for the commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the offense or a closely related offense is a violation of the UCMJ and warrants a punitive discharge in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial. There is no requirement for adjudication by judicial or non-judicial proceedings, but the offense must be substantiated by a preponderance of the evidence. During the Applicant’s three years of service, he was found guilty at two NJPs for violating numerous serious UCMJ articles and met the requirements for administrative separation due to Misconduct (Serious Offense) and Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct). The fact that the violations occurred away from his workplace has no bearing on the propriety of the violations. As a service member, he was responsible for his actions at all times. By his repetitive and serious misconduct, he warranted an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge, however, his command leniently processed him for separation with a recommendation for a General discharge. The NDRB found his discharge to be warranted, proper, and very equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00719

    Original file (ND01-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MMFN (applicant) is not alcohol dependent, enclosure (8). 901012: Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved separation under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the Commission of a serious offense. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that although the discharge was determined to have been proper and equitable at the time of issuance, an inequity...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300837

    Original file (ND1300837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01001

    Original file (ND03-01001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960124 - 960520 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960521 Date of Discharge:...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-122

    Original file (2007-122.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on April 14, 2005, the Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) approved the applicant’s request for separation, and the applicant received an OTH discharge on May 12, 2005. The applicant stated that the Coast Guard may argue that even if SK1 O’s statement had been sent to his counsel, the Coast Guard would still have taken action against him, but the out- come of such proceedings cannot now be known because LT S, the trial counsel, failed to dis- close the exculpatory evidence to the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00962

    Original file (ND04-00962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant Copy of Domestic...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500320

    Original file (MD1500320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007978

    Original file (20110007978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 9 September 2010, from his official military personnel file (OMPF) and restoration of rank and pay grade of sergeant (SGT), E-5, with back pay. If his request is subsequently denied by the ADRB, he may petition the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01391

    Original file (ND03-01391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01391 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030820. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400150

    Original file (MD1400150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remainDISABILITY, SEVERANCE PAY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201175

    Original file (MD1201175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...