Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201535

Original file (ND1201535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AE3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120705

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20060921 - 20061003     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20061004     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20110930      Highest Rank/Rate: AE3
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 27 D ay(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 95
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 6 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 6 )        OTA: 3.17

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20070712 :      Article (False official statements)
         Article (Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling:

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20110904 :      Charges: DUI [Extracted from Commanding Officer's letter dated 20110922]

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ JKQ ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 18 August 2011 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 107 and 111 .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants back pay from 30 September 2011 to 3 October 2011.
2 .       The Applicant contends his DD Form 214 discharge date of 30 September 2011 is incorrect, because his chief and commanding officer signed his final evaluation on 3 October 2011, which is the last day of his enlistment and so he reached his End of Active Obligated Service (EAOS) and warrants an Honorable discharge for his five years of service.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0426             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 107 ( False official statement, 1 specification) and Article 111 ( Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel, 1 specification ) and one civilian arrest for DUI. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not eligible for an administrative separation board.

Issue 1: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants back pay from 30 September 2011 to 3 October 2011. The NDRB is not authorized to award back pay as it is only authorized to review the propriety and equity of a discharge. Back pay is a matter for the Board for Correction of Naval Records, and their website can be found at http://www.donhq.navy.mil/bcnr/bcnr.htm .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his DD Form 214 discharge date of 30 September 2011 is incorrect, because his chief and commanding officer signed his final evaluation on 3 October 2011, which is the last day of his enlistment and so he reached his EAOS and warrants an Honorable discharge for his five years of service. The Applicant’s discharge date of 30 September 2011 on his DD Form 214 is correct. On 20 September 2011, the Applicant’s command notified him of administrative separation processing for Misconduct (Serious Offense) and Multiple DUIs. He waived his rights to submit a written statement, consult with a qualified counsel, and have his discharge reviewed by the General Court-Martial Convening Authority. On 26 September 2011, approval was granted to discharge the Applicant within 10 days for Misconduct (Serious Offense) Under Honorable Conditions (General). His discharge was finalized on 30 September 2011, and this is accurately reflected on his DD Form 214. The signing of his final evaluation by his chief, commanding officer, and the Applicant on 3 October 2011 does not serve as his discharge date. Completing his final evaluation was an administrative matter and does not supersede the DD Form 214. Even if he was discharged on 3 October 2011, he did not reach his EAOS, which goes to 2359 on the last day of an enlistment.

Since t he Applicant was administratively separated and not separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation , t he characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. Other considerations shall be given to the member’s length of service, grade, aptitude, and physical and mental condition. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found T herefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401604

Original file (ND1401604.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19981119 - 19981214Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19981215Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20031214Highest Rank/Rate:AE3Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 00 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 31EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.9(7)Behavior:3.3(7)OTA: 3.45Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):(2) (2)...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902011

Original file (ND0902011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400664

Original file (ND1400664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, did not report civilian arrest for drinking under the influence of alcohol) and Article 111 (Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel). ” Additional...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200616

Original file (ND1200616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500580

Original file (ND1500580.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Although the arrest occurred in a different enlistment than...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100326

Original file (MD1100326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the significant misconduct of record, and without the Applicant’s Pro/Con mark history, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s command was justified in awarding him a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon separation.Issues 1-2: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to increase employment opportunities and to obtain veteran education benefits. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500259

Original file (ND1500259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500749

Original file (ND1500749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300977

Original file (ND1300977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19841024 - 19841028Active:19841029-19900726 Active: 19900727 - 19940604Active: 19940605 -19971028 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19971029Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040409Highest Rank/Rate:IC1Length of Service:Years Months12 DaysEducation Level:AFQT:...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200767

Original file (ND1200767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201535

Similar Decisions