Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201523
Original file (ND1201523.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


ex-GMC, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120705
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        1995031 - 19950924      Active:            19950925 - 20010603
                                             20010604 - 20070503

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070504     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 2011 1201      Highest Rank/Rate: GMC
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 61
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.7 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.91

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol (3) (2) (3)
Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20080208 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article 112 (Drunk on duty)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 950925 UNTIL 070503 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
          From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant wants to be reinstated into the Navy .
2.       The Applicant contends improper command bias.
3.       The Applicant contends civilian and Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) charges were dropped , and JAG lawyers opted twice not to take the case to a court-martial.

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 0517             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service in his current enlistment included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave) and Article 112 (Drunk on duty) . On 08 December 2010, N CIS and the Virginia State Police executed a search warrant on the Applicant’s home that resulted in the seizure of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia. The Applicant did not have a pre-service drug waiver for using illicit drugs prior to entering the Navy. Based on the wrongful possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercis ed rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . The Applicant was notified of separation proceedings for Commission of a Serious Offense in which the least favorable characterization of service possible was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The administrative board voted 3-0 that the preponderance of the evidence supported that the Applicant committed misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense and recommended separation with a n Under Honorable Conditions (General) characterization. The Separation Authority approved these recommendations, and the Applicant was discharged accordingly.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to be reinstated into the Navy . Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code or order reinstatement . Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can authorize these actions.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends improper command bias. The Applicant submitted an e-mail that he contends demonstrates a continued bias from his command. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. The NDRB determined the e-mail provided by the Applicant and his personal statements do not overcome the presumption of regularity . Although the Applicant may feel that his administrative board treated him unfairly due to the members being chosen by his officer - in - charge, the administrative board voted to recommend an Under Honorable Conditions (General) characterization vice the least favorable characterization of service allowed , which was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions . The NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the formation of the administrative board and determined the Applicant’s separation was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends civilian and NCIS charges were dropped, and JAG lawyers opted twice not to take the case to a court-martial. In accordance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual, servicemembers may be separated based on the commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the commanding officer believes the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation and the offense would warrant a punitive discharge if adjudicated at trial by court-martial for the same or closely related offense. Commission of a serious

offense does not require adjudication by nonjudicial or judicial proceedings or civilian conviction, however, the offense must be substantiated by a preponderance of evidence. The administrative board voted 3-0 that the preponderance of the evidence supported that the Applicant had committed serious misconduct. The statements and documents provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The NDRB determined his discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant is not eligible for further reviews from the NDRB. The Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review using DD Form 149. Their website can be found at http://www.donhq.navy.mil/bcnr/bcnr.htm.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 18 August 2011 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701234

    Original file (ND0701234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900022

    Original file (ND0900022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.The Applicant provided evidence of an Honorable discharge from the Army National Guard on 17 May 2007 and provided statements regarding...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700923

    Original file (ND0700923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues 3 & 4: ().A Sailor may be separated for a commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was marred by the award of one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 134 (Wrongfully commit an indecent act).A violation of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100811

    Original file (ND1100811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Based on the offense...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201097

    Original file (ND1201097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401221

    Original file (ND1401221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the document review and the Personal Hearing, the Applicant’s record of service, documentation sent in by the Applicant for in-service and post-service conduct, as well as any statements made written or verbal are examined to see if relief is in order. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100140

    Original file (ND1100140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined that relief based on this issue was not warranted. The Board determined that relief based on this issue, in conjunction with his in-service conduct, was not warranted.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s testimony, summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board foundThe Board determined that the awarded characterization of service shall , but the narrative reason for separation shall...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101268

    Original file (ND1101268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. The Applicant was administratively separated from the Navy on 13 November 2007 with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense).Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201303

    Original file (ND1201303.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902067

    Original file (ND0902067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:To Convenience of Government Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19900531 - 19901024Active:19901025 - 1994102419941025 - 2000102320001024 - 20061019 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20061020Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090618Highest Rank/Rate:AC1Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...