Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201319
Original file (ND1201319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-DC2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120710
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:       Expiration of Term of Service
        
Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20050830 - 20060821     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060822     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20120321      Highest Rank/Rate: DC2
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 0 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 81
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.7 ( 6 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 6 )         OTA: 3.29

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) (2) KDSM (2) (2) CGSOSR GWOTSM
Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20100624 :      Article (Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel; arrested by San Diego Police for driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20111220 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, on or about 18 December 2011 failed to obey an order by not returning to the ship for duty section muster)
         Article (Absence without leave, 0630 to 1030 on 18 December 2011)
         Article 112 (Drunk on duty, on or about 18 December 2011 was found to be drunk while in a duty status)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :    SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling :

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20100610 :       Charges: Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI), San Diego Police Department

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
          From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends he was never issued and there fore did not violate a NAVPERS 1070/613 retention warning, which is required per Naval Military Personnel Manual ( MILPERSMAN ) Article 1910-140.
2.       The Applicant contends he did not receive copies of his Administrative Separation Processing Notification Procedure (NAVPERS 1910 / 32) as per MILPER S MAN 1910-402 and was therefore denied due process.
3 .       The Applicant contends he was wrongly denied an Administrative Separation Board.
4.       The Applicant contends his record of service warrants consideration for an upgrade to Honorable.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0314             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service inc luded for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 111 ( Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation ), Article 86 (Absence without leave), and Article 112 ( Drunk on duty). Based on the offense s committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review . He was not eligible for an Administrative Separation Board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was never issued and there fore did not violate a NAVPERS 1070/613 retention warning, which is required per MILPERSMAN Article 1910-140. He also contends he did not receive copies of his Administrative Separation Processing Notification Procedure (NAVPERS 1910 / 32) as per MILPER S MAN 1910-402 and was therefore denied due process. The NDRB was unable to review the Applicant’s complete discharge package, as it was not included in its entirety in his official service record. The NDRB presumed regularity in governmental affairs in that the Separation Authority and Staff Judge Advocate review of the discharge package ensured that the Applicant was afforded all of his administrative rights pursuant to the separation process , to include having violated a Page 13 retention warning during his enlistment . The Applicant did not submit any documentation to rebut any presumption of regularity in governmental affairs. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Further, not receiving copies of NAVPERS 1910/32 does not invalidate the propriety of the Applicant’s administrative separation processing. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was wrongly denied an Administrative Separation Board as he served greater than six years if his service in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) is counted . Pursuant to Navy regulation s , a servi cemember is not entitled to an A dministrative S eparation B oard unless the least favorable characterization of service is Under Other Than Honorable Conditions or the servicemember has 6 or more years of total active and/or reserve military service. The Applicant ’ s contention that his time served in the DEP in addition to his active duty time exceeds six years is incorrect. Per D epartment of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14 -R , Volume 7A, Chapter 1, par agraph 01010 1 (Service Which is Creditable) , D .1 2 .b .(2) , service is not creditable for service performed as an enlisted member in a Reserve Component under 10 USC 513 (Enlistments: Delayed Entry Program), other than a period of active duty. So, while the Applicant was in the Naval Reserve while in the DEP, his time there was not creditable for service and so does not count toward the six years required to elect an administrative separation board if recommended for an Under

Honorable Conditions (General) characterization of service. The Air Force instruction cited by the Applicant is not applicable to U.S. Navy Sailors. Since the Applicant had less than six years of service at the time of notification of administrative separation processing and was being recommended for a n Under Honorable Conditions (General) characterization of service, he was not entitled to a n Administrative Separation Board. The NDRB determined his separation processing was proper. Relief denied.

Issue 4: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his record of service warrants consideration for an upgrade to Honorable. The Applicant was administratively separated and not separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation. The characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. Other considerations shall be given to the member’s length of service, grade, aptitude, and physical and mental condition. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301560

    Original file (ND1301560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB concluded that while the Applicant’s separation was properly approved, it resulted in an inequitably assigned characterization of service.Further, the Applicant received an Honorable characterization of service for his first enlistment from April 2004 to October 2007. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301013

    Original file (ND1301013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100311

    Original file (ND1100311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500025

    Original file (ND1500025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000894

    Original file (ND1000894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002331

    Original file (ND1002331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01086

    Original file (ND04-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Evaluations (5 pages) Applicant’ s DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990621 - 990907 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 990908 Date of Discharge: 020508 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 08 01 Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900294

    Original file (ND0900294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the evidence, the NDRB determined the administrative separation was conducted properly and an upgrade in characterization would be inappropriate.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701196

    Original file (ND0701196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401645

    Original file (ND1401645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL. ” Additional...