Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201024

Original file (ND1201024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YNSR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120405

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19890929 - 1 9 891112     Active:          19891113 - 19931012 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19931013     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20000331      Highest Rank/Rate: YN2
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 19 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 56
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.3 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.45

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      CGSO SR (2) JMU A LOC

Periods of UA : NONE

NJP :    S CM :             CC:     Retention Warning Counseling :

SPCM:

- 19970630 :       Art icle (Larceny and wrongful appropriation)
         Art icle 132 (Frauds against the United States)
         Sentence : CONF 300 days (19970630 - 19971103, 124 days served)

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error s on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERSMAN 5815-010 ”
“ 97JUN30 TO 97NOV03 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to be eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.
2 .        The Applicant contends he warrants clemency , because it was an isolated incident and he served honorably in Operation Just Cause in Panama and Desert Storm and Desert Shield in Iraq.
3 .       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct of being a member of the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars for 8 years and making a positive difference in the community is worthy of consideration for clemency.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0213             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included Special Court-Martial for violations o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Larceny and wrongful appropriation) and Article 132 (Frauds against the United States) . The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 30 June 1997 . A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process before a Military Judge alone . Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge and confinement for a period of 124 days. The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals with a single assignment of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed on 2 1 March 200 0 . Subsequently, the Navy Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity ordered the Bad Conduct Discharge executed.

Issue 1: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to be eligible for VA benefits. The VA determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he warrants clemency, because it was an isolated incident and he served honorably in Operation Just Cause in Panama and Desert Storm and Desert Shield in Iraq. The Applicant’s service record documents a period of service of approximately 40 months prior to engaging in the misconduct of record for which he was discharged. The NDRB found two adverse action s of record during this period for UCMJ Article 111 and 128 vi olations; however , the Applicant received an Honorable discharge and was allowed to re-enlist on 13 October 1993 . The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging. Most service members, however, serve honorably and therefore earn their Honorable or General discharges. In fairness to those service members, commanders and separation authorities are directed to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. Due to the egregious nature of the Applicant’s misconduct, charges were referred to a Special Court-Martial, where he was found guilty. Despite his previous service in his current enlistment, the NDRB determined clemency was not warranted due to the serious nature of the misconduct. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service conduct of being a member of the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars for 8 years and making a positive difference in the community is worthy of consideration for clemency . The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement and eight character references. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. After reviewing the documentation provided by the Applicant, the NDRB determined clemency was not warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 22, effective 15 December 1998 to 21 August 2002, Article 5815-010, Executing a Dishonorable or Bad Conduct Discharge.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001468

Original file (ND1001468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19961115 - 19961216Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19961217Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19991212Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)02 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIR OTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONE Periods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901537

Original file (ND0901537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Although the NDRB appreciated the Applicant’s post-service conduct, the board members determined the Applicant’s post service accomplishments were not sufficient to form a basis of relief, considering his offenses.After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post-service accomplishments, the NDRB determined that clemency was not warranted and that...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401627

Original file (ND1401627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801210

Original file (ND0801210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901454

Original file (ND0901454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, the Applicant must have a full understanding that post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400102

Original file (ND1400102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800099

Original file (ND0800099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Request the Board’s relief with an up-grade of his characterization of service based on clemency. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT-MARTIAL.Discussion Issue 1 () The Applicant request the Board’s relief with an up-grade of his characterization of service based on clemency. The Applicant claims he made the decision to enter into an unauthorized absence (UA) status when he was told he would not be able to have elective surgery to remove the mass on a scheduled date due to the...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500951

Original file (ND1500951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Decisional) (Clemency) . Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COURT-MARTIAL. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700160

Original file (ND0700160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Discharge Process Charge(s) Preferred:19970611Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 19961220 until apprehended on 19970331Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 19970630 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700972

Original file (ND0700972.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201024

Similar Decisions