Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200440

Original file (ND1200440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20111220

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20080428 - 20081012     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20081013     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100709      Highest Rank/Rate: SA
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 02 D ay(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 41
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.17

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Period of C ONF : Pre-trial 20100615-20100707

NJP :

- 20090917 :      Article (Absence without leave, 6 specifications )
         Specification 1: 20090804-20090805, 2 days
         Specification 2: 20090810-20090811, 2 days
         Specification 3: 0730-1200, 20090817
         Specification 4: 0730-0830, 20090818
         Specification 5: 20090824-20090825, 2 days
         Specification 6:0730-0908, 20090906
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated 20091211

- 20091210 :      Article (Absence without leave, 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: 0730-0805, 20091016
         Specification 2: 0730-0815, 2009101 7
         Specification 3: 0730-0825, 20091116
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20100128:      Article (Absence without leave, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Failed to go to duty muster section on 20091229
         Specification 2: 2010 01 15-20100119, 5 days
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20091006:      For violation of Article 86, unauthorized absence that led to your non-judicial punishment of 20090117.

C i vi lian Arrest :

- 20100510 :       Offense: Resiting arrest, disorderly conduct and two count s of destructon of property
         Sentence : The charges of resisting arrest and disorderly conduct were dismissed and the Newport New Commonwealth Attorney declined to prosecute one count of destruction of property. SR W_ received deferred disposition on the second count of destruction of property.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 31 May 2005 until Present, Article 1910-106, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident in 24 months of service with no other advers e action.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 1220 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning, non-judicial punishments for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 11 specifications) , and one civilian arrest . The Applicant’s record of service reflect s an additional period of unauthorized absence lasting 48 days for which charges were referred to a special court-martial. On 7 July 2010 , the Applicant submitted a request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. In the request for discharge, he noted , in writing, his full understanding of the elements of the offense for which he was charged and that he was guilty of the offense. He certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service could be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. His command approved his request and administratively processed him for separation.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident in 24 months of service with no other adverse action . In the Applicant’s 19 months of service, he had a retention warning, three NJPs, a civilian arrest, and charges referred to a special court-martial. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Navy to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 86, specifically for a period of more than 30 days, is one such offense. A period of unauthorized absence lasting more than 30 days usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge, and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The Applicant was absent without leave for 48 day s before he was apprehended by civilian authorities . On 7 July 2010, the Applicant requested separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. His command approved his request, choosing not to pursue a punitive discharge and opt ing instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. The NDRB determined that relief based on this issue was not warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201786

Original file (ND1201786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301283

Original file (ND1301283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no indication in the evidence of record or in the documentation submitted by the Applicant that the Applicant was recommended for or processed for a medical board by proper authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101343

Original file (ND1101343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Senior Member of the ASB forwarded the findings to the Applicant’s Commanding Officer as follows: (By 3-0 vote) via a preponderance of the evidence, the Applicant committed Misconduct- Serious Offense and Misconduct- Civil Conviction; (By 3-0 vote) the Applicant should be separated from the Navy; (By 3-0 vote) the Applicant should receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct.The Applicant was separated from the Navy on 28...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401189

Original file (MD1401189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remainUNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700247

Original file (ND0700247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19900507 - 19901001Active: 19901002 - 1995092819950929 - 19980910 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980911Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20000223 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: 19 Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 56Highest Rank/Rate:AC2Evaluation marks (# of occasions): Performance: 3.0(2) Behavior: 2.5(2) OTA: 2.64 Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):MERITORIOUS UNIT...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500065

Original file (ND1500065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave; 6 specifications) and Article 108 (Military property of the United States-sale, loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition, 1 specification), and three civilian convictions for (Reckless driving, 2 counts), (Suspended license, 1 count), (Distribution of a controlled substance, 1 count) and (Conspiracy, 2 counts). ...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300487

Original file (ND1300487.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for service-related health benefits.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100994

Original file (ND1100994.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the preponderance of the evidence that the offenses were committed by the Applicant, her command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300154

Original file (MD1300154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301384

Original file (MD1301384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since 15 years have elapsed since the date of his discharge, the Applicant is not eligible...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200440

Similar Decisions