Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200075
Original file (ND1200075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-GSMFA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20111006
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20061101 - 20070219     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070220     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20091030      Highest Rank/Rate: GSM 3
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 11 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 57
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 5 )      Behavior: 2.8 ( 5 )        OTA: 3.47

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      , , , , ESWS

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20090729 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: Wrongfully having a relationship with GSM1, that was unduly familiar
         Specification 2: Wrongfully providing alcohol to Naval personnel under 21 years of age
         Specification 3: Wrongfully consuming alcohol under the legal drinking age of 21 years old
         Article 120 (Rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct)
         Article (General A rticle - adultery)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        



Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective 15 May 2009 until 25 April 2010,
Article 1910-148, SEPARATION BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. Public Law 111-321, signed 22 Dec 2010 (implemented 20 Sep 2011).

D. Under Secretary of Defense (P & R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), 20 Sep 2011.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. The Applicant seeks an upgrade due to the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tel l” policy.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 05 23           Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE- 4 .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identified one decisional issue to the NDRB related to the equity and propriety of h er discharge. In addition, t he NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure the discharge action met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The
Applicant’s record of service documents one nonjudicial punishment for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) . On 29 July 2009, the Applicant was found guilty of violating Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation , 3 specifications), Article 120 (Sexual Misconduct), and Article 134 (General Article - Adultery). Due to the allegations of a homosexual act occurring, which the c ommanding o fficer found to be credible, an investigation into the alleged misconduct was conduct ed . As a result of the investigation, to include statements provided by the Applicant, it was determined that the Applicant had engaged in a homosexual act on more than one occasion. As such, the Applicant was processed for administrative separation following the nonjudicial punishment. When notified of administrative separation processing using the board procedure, the Applicant was advised that the least favorable characterization of service warranted at discharge was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The Applicant acknowledged h er understanding of the notification of separation proceedings and h er rights therein; s he waive d her right s to consult with a qualified legal defense counsel , to request an administrative hearing board be convened to hear her case, and to submit a written statement to the S eparatio n Authority for consideration.

: (Decisional Issue ) ( ) . The Applicant seeks a n upgrade due to the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy . The Applicant received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of h er service at discharge. In accordance with t he Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) , (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27 ( effective 15 May 2009 until 25 April 2010 ) , Article 1910-148, SEPARATION BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUC T , which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, the Applicant’s in-service statement s to h er chain-of-command, coupled with the command investigation, documented that s he had engaged in homosexual relationships and created a rebuttable presumption that s he had the propensity to engage in homosexual acts. The Applicant chose not to challenge or to rebut this presumption - in writing . Based on the statement made by the Applicant , h er decision not to rebut any presumptions thereafter, and the c ommanding o fficer’s belief that the Applicant’s statements were credible, the Applicant was processed administratively f or involuntary separation and was assigned a corresponding reentry code of RE-4. At the time of discharge, processing for separation was mandatory in accordance with the MILPERSMAN and Department of Defense P olicy under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law . Given the detailed documents of record, the Applicant’s personal statement, and the c ommanding o fficer’s statement in the administrative separation endorsement, the NDRB determined that the Appli cant’s separation by reason of H omosexual C onduct ( A ct ) , in accordance with Article 1910-148 of the MILPERSMAN, coupled with the misconduct or record, was proper and equita ble at the time it was issued.

Characterization of Service : Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. An Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service generally meets the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for Naval personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization of service would be clearly inappropriate. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. The Applicant’s service record reflected one NJP for having an unduly familiar relationship with her Leading Petty Officer , consuming alcoholic beverages while under the legal age to do so , providing alcohol to other S ailors under the legal age to do so , engaging in homosexual acts , and for engaging in a sexual relationship with a Sailor she knew to be married. Given the comments of the d ivision o fficer and chief petty officer who made recommendations regarding retention of the Applicant during the investigation , the NDRB determined that the misconduct was reflective of the Applicant’s overall performance of duties and conduct. Based on the evidence of record, and in consideration of the statements from the chain of command and counseling records regarding the Applicant’s performance and conduct, the NDRB , by a vote of 5-0, determined the quality of the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful . However, significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty as documented in the investigation and nonjudicial punishment outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record . As such, it is appropriate to characterize the service as General (U nder Honorable C onditions ) . Relief denied .

Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repe a l of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Conduct was the only basis for discharge . This memorandum further directs that the narrative reason for separation should normally change to Secretarial Authority with a corresponding Separation Code designator (SPD code). The record of service reflects that, at the time of discharge, the Applicant was notified of only one reason for discharge - H omosexual C onduct ( A ct s ) - and that no aggravating factors were involved. Given the documented misconduct, the Applicant should have also been notified for separation due to Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) , however, the command chose to notify the Applicant for discharge solely based on Homosexual Conduct ( A ct s ). Accordingly, the NDRB determined that the narrative reason for separation will change to Secretarial Authority ; additionally, the DD Form 214 shall be amended to reflect a corrected authority for discharge (MILPERSMAN 1910-164) with a corresponding S eparation Code designator of JFF.

Reentry Code : In accordance with the Under Secretary of Defense (P & R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 September 2011, s ervice r eview b oards should normally grant requests to change the reentry code to an immediately-eligible-to-reenter category if the discharge and corresponding reentry code was: (1) based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT; and (2), there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct. As authorized by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs), the NDRB may change reentry codes as set forth in the USD (P&R) memorandum dated 20 September 2011. The USD (P&R) policy memorandum stated that, if applicable, the new RE code should be RE- 1J , however, this is an Air Force specific re-entry code. In accordance with the guidance and intent of the policy memorandum, the applicable U.S. Navy reentry code would be RE-1 (eligible for reenlistment ). The Applicant received an RE-4 reentry code due to early termination of h er service for Homosexual Act and misconduct while in service. The Applicant’s service record documents unacceptable misconduct (having an adulterous relationship and failing to abide by orders and regulations) . The NDRB determined that the record of service, coupled with the record of misconduct, would not warrant a recommendation for retention had the Applicant not been involuntarily separated for her Homosexual A ct . As such, in accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s reentry code shall remain RE-4.
Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries , and the administrative separation process, the NDRB found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321 , and in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Under Secretary of Defense (P & R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 Sep 2011, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS), but the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY with a corresponding SPD code of JFF and the authority for discharge shall change to MILPERSMAN 1910-164 . The assigned reentry code shall remain RE- 4 . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of the discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200302

    Original file (ND1200302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Discharge: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, ” service discharge review boards should normally consider granting requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge and no other aggravating factors were involved. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321, and in accordance with the guidance...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201128

    Original file (MD1201128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-1A.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Given the detailed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200272

    Original file (ND1200272.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, ” service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. Accordingly, the NDRB determined that the relief, as requested, is warranted; therefore, the Applicant’s reentry code shall change to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200295

    Original file (ND1200295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Discharge: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321, and in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Under Secretary of Defense (P&R)...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200288

    Original file (MD1200288.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-4.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. However, pursuant to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102140

    Original file (MD1102140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Supplemental Issues submitted: The Applicant seeks a change in the narrative reason for his discharge and to upgrade the characterization of his discharge to Honorable The Service Secretary approved the recommendation for separation and directed the Applicant’s discharge from the Marine Corps for Homosexual Conduct (Acts) with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of his service for the period under review. Given the detailed documents of record, including the Command...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200577

    Original file (MD1200577.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Reentry Code change to: RE-1A Summary of ServicePrior Service: USA National Guard(1 yr, 7 months) - Discharged 20070806 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization for Unsatisfactory Performance Inactive Service: USMCR (DEP)20070807 - 20070807Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070807Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201222

    Original file (ND1201222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200108

    Original file (ND1200108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-4.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Narrative Reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200519

    Original file (ND1200519.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall HONORABLE.By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-1.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible...