Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201888

Original file (MD1201888.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120912

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:                           Active:

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060922     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20101103      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
         Active: Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 80
MOS: 0341
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle AFRM

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:    SCM:    SPCM: CC:    Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends it was an isolated incident in 40 months of service.
2.       The Applicant contends his in-service conduct , to include an Iraq deployment , warrants an upgrade.
3.       The Applicant contends his physical and medical health problems led to his misconduct.
4.       The Applicant contends the violent deaths of three close family members led to his misconduct.
5.       The Applicant contends officers and non-commissioned officers in his com pany recommended a General discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0606          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no 6105 counseling warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. However, the Applicant tested positive for marijuana ( 88 ng/ml , NAVDRUGLAB msg dtd 20100325) , which is a violation of the Marine Corps zero-tolerance drug policy and Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of a controlled substance) . The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using illicit drugs prior to entering the Marine Corps . Based on the Article 112a violation , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel and request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends it was an isolated incident in 40 months of service. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade, performance, deployments, or time in service. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge was equitable and consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his in-service conduct , to include an Iraq deployment , warrants an upgrade. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant engaged in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constituted a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his physical and medical health problems led to his misconduct. When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which medical problems might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated conditions or diagnoses to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. The NDRB was able to obtain the Applicant’s medical records from the Department of Veterans Affairs Records Management Center in St. Louis, MO. These records show that the Applicant was receiving chiropractic care for his lower back pain and prescribed medications for his insomnia. Even if he was not receiving adequate medical treatment, this does not excuse his misconduct. After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined his lower back pain and insomnia did not mitigate or excuse his misconduct. Relief denied. The Applicant can request his medical records from the Department of Veterans Affairs by going to www.archives.gov .

4: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the violent deaths of three close family members led to his misconduct. While the Applicant may feel that the deaths of his family members were a contributing factor to his misconduct, they do not mitigate his disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the Naval Service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. Relief denied.

5: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends officers and non-commissioned officers in his company recommended a General discharge. The Applicant’s chain - of - command recommendations for separation are just that, recommendation s . Further, t he service record clearly shows the Commanding Officer, Weapons Company, Third Battalion, Twenty-Third Marine Regiment recommended the Applicant be discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Regardless, the Separation Authority determines whether the allegations in the notification of the basis for separation are substantiated by the evidence and makes the final determination as to the characterization of service . The NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity and determined the Applicant’s separation for drug abuse was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301496

Original file (MD1301496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB also viewed the entire service of the Applicant at his personal hearing and determined that a preponderance of the evidence supported discharge for violation of the Marine Corps drug policy, that separation from the Naval Service was appropriate, and that an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service was warranted.Relief denied. The Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does show he is doing well as a civilian, but it does not...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101138

Original file (MD1101138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401284

Original file (MD1401284.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: MISCONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF A DIRECT ORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060817 - 20070805Active:Pre-Service Drug Waiver: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070806Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110408Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)02 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:61MOS: 1391Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400790

Original file (MD1400790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 14 December 2009, an Administrative Separation Board determined that a preponderance of the evidence supported drug abuseand recommended the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, but that the separation be suspended. Full relief to Honorable and a narrative change to Administrative was not granted because of the serious nature of the misconduct and because he was properly discharged for Misconduct (Drug Abuse).Summary: After a thorough review...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301729

Original file (MD1301729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Relief denied.Summary: After...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300119

Original file (MD1300119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100805

Original file (MD1100805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101696

Original file (MD1101696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends there were not enough incidents of misconduct to warrant an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401575

Original file (MD1401575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

- 20121018: Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) Awarded: Suspended: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200667

Original file (MD1200667.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant engaged in conduct involving an act that constituted a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201888

Similar Decisions