Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201584
Original file (MD1201584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120710
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20101001 - 20110306     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20110307     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20110916      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 10 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 34
MOS: NONE
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 4.2 (1) / 4.2 (1)      Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:             SCM:             SPCM:            CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20110727 :       For on 20110727, SNM failed to meet the minimum requirements to pass Marksmanship Table 3. SNM was given three opportunities to pass at which he failed all three.

- 20110729 :       For your diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder, not o therwise specified (NOS) , rule out Post - Traumatic Stress Disorder , which inte r feres with your duties and performance, specifically , your inability to participate in rigorous exercise, unit training, conditioning hikes, and field duty.

- 20110822 :       For your diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder NOS , s pecifically , your continued statements to students and instructors of your desire to be separated from service and you r continued depressed mood has constituted a failure to take corrective action and has allowed your mental condition to continue to interfere with your duties .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ ERRONEOUS ENTRY, OTHER ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.



Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant wants a change to his reentry code to reenlist.
2.       The Applicant contends he did not have any misconduct to warrant an Uncharacterized discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0502            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER) .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standar ds of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and a diagnos is by a clinical psychiatrist of A nxiety D isorder and a pre-service history of untreated m ental health problems. Based on the diagnosis and recommendation of the M ental H ealth U nit, his command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitl ed to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants a change to his reentry code to reenlist. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not have any misconduct to warrant an Uncharacterized discharge. An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when separation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge , and t here was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. A review of the service record shows the Applicant was notified of administrative separation processing for Erroneous Enlistment with an Uncharacterized characterization of service on 31 August 2011, which is 178 days of service. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. A General discharge is warranted when there has been misconduct. The Applicant did not have any misconduct during his service and so did not warrant a General discharge. Rather, he warranted the more favorable Uncharacterized discharge. Also, there was no fraudulent intent by the Applicant to withhold information about pre-service mental health problems, and so the Erroneous Entry narrative reason was proper. If there had been fraud by the Applicant, he would have received a Fraudulent Entry narrative reason. The NDRB determined the Uncharacterized discharge for Erroneous Entry was warranted , proper, and equitable. Relief denied.
The Applicant also contends he earned a Good Conduct Medal. This is incorrect. To be awarded a Good Conduct Medal, a Marine must serve for 3 consecutive years without misconduct. The Applicant only served for 6 months and 10 days. The confusion likely arose from Block 18 on the Applicant’s DD Form 214, which tracks the start date of the 3-year period for the Good Conduct Medal. The Applicant’s Block 18 has a start date of 7 March 2011, which is when the Applicant started his active duty service.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301877

    Original file (ND1301877.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB determined,per Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 December 1997 until 19 May 1999, Article 1910-120, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITIONS, which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, that her narrative reason for separation should be Condition, Not a Disability.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901022

    Original file (ND0901022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070525 - 20070625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070626Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070802Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)07 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 49EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401711

    Original file (ND1401711 .rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: MEDICAL DISCHARGE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20110727 - 20120730 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120731 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20121102 Highest Rank/Rate: SA Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 03 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: 51 Evaluation Marks: Performance: NFIR ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201824

    Original file (MD1201824.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20100701 - 20110612Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20110613Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110727Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)15 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:83MOS: 8000Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):N/A/N/AFitness...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301704

    Original file (ND1301704.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030228-20030908Active: 20030909-20070908 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070909Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20121218Highest Rank/Rate:BU2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 10 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.4(5)Behavior:3.2(5)OTA: 3.40Awards...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301590

    Original file (ND1301590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his in-service conduct warrants an upgrade.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200816

    Original file (ND1200816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist into the Armed Forces.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001935

    Original file (MD1001935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Nondecisional Issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to facilitate employment opportunities.Decisional Issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade to Honorable and a change to his narrative reason for separation, because he believes his service was honorable and he does not have a personality disorder. Additionally, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800955

    Original file (MD0800955.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is clear no such circumstance exists in the Applicant’s case and as such the NDRB determined the discharge characterization should remain “Uncharacterized.” Finally, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801850

    Original file (MD0801850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should understand neither the “Uncharacterized” characterization nor the “ Erroneous Enlistment ” narrative reason for separation convey any negative meaning. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and a change to the characterization of service or the narrative reason for separation would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence...