Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201090
Original file (MD1201090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120417
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20070127 - 20070624     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20070625     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20100603      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 09 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 41
MOS: 3381
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /                   Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of CONF :

NJP:
- 20090429 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated on 20090513

- 20090520 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Article (General A rticle)
          Awarded: Suspended: Vacated on 20090630

- 20100317 :      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:
- 20090730 :      Article (Assault , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Unlawful assault by poking with a broken chair
         Specification 2: Unlawful assault by spitting
          Sentence:

SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20090429 :      For NJP violation s of the UCMJ, Article s 86 and 92.

- 20090603 :      For NJP violations of the UCMJ, Article s 86, 92 , and 134.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends he did not complete his mission and would like to enlist in the Army .
 2.       The Applicant contends his hope and love was taken and assault charges were only brought up after his second NJP and     were used to give him an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge.
 3 .       The Applicant contends he is a good person, has grown and learned from his mistakes, and has maintained a steady job, suggesting his post-service conduct warrants consideration for upgrading his discharge.
Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0213            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, non-judicial punishments (NJP) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications) , Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications) , Article 112a ( Wrongful use of a controlled substance, marijuana), and Article 134 (General Article). His service also included summary court-martial for of the UCMJ: Article 128 ( Assault, 2 specifications). The Applica nt did not require a pre-service drug waiver for using illicit substances prior to entering the Marine Corps . However, he did acknowledge complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 25 January 2007 . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The Applicant met the requirements for separation based on Misconduct (Drug Abuse), Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), and Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct). Based on the Article 112a violation , processing for administrative separation is mandatory . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

: (Non-decisional) The Applicant contends he did not complete his mission and would like to enlist in the Army. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Furthermore, since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, it is not authorized to change a Reentry (RE) code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable RE code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of the propriety and the equity of a discharge.
Issue 2: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his hope and love was taken and assault charges were only brought up after his second NJP and were used to give him an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. Before the Applicant had served two years, he was found guilty of several serious offenses at two NJPs and received two retention warnings. Either of these NJPs, along with the retention warning violation, could have led to his administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense) or Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct). However, his command allowed him to continue to serve. Within two months of his second NJP, the Applicant was found guilty at a Summary Court-Martial for two violations of UCMJ Article 128 (Assault). Again, however, he was given yet another chance and was allowed to continue to serve. Eight months after the court-martial, the Applicant was found guilty of violating UCMJ Article 112a at his third NJP. Violation of this article requires mandatory separation processing. Despite being given multiple opportunities to correct his poor behavior, the Applicant continued to engage in serious misconduct and warranted separation Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.


: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he is a good person, has grown and learned from his mistakes, and has maintained a steady job, suggesting his post-service conduct warrants consideration for upgrading his discharge. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law, or regulation, that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he failed to provide any documentary evidence on his behalf for post-service consideration. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum with the recognition that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. Without post-service documentary evidence, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101830

    Original file (MD1101830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901456

    Original file (ND0901456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101808

    Original file (ND1101808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401081

    Original file (ND1401081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident of misconduct over multiple enlistments.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201016

    Original file (MD1201016.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Such matters are a function of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR).During its review of the Applicant’s case, the NDRB became aware of an 8 May 2012 decision by the BCNR concerning the Applicant’s request for a change in his discharge characterization of service and narrative reason for separation made concurrently with his request for relief from the NDRB. 12631-11, the BCNR, after a review of the Applicant’s issues and contentions, determined that relief in the form of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901389

    Original file (ND0901389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19991221 - 19991228Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19991229Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20011213Highest Rank/Rate:FNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)14 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 42EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.6(3)Behavior:2.3(3)OTA: 2.66Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100019

    Original file (MD1100019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100828

    Original file (ND1100828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Admin Board proceeding was held on 21 March 2010.On 22 Mar 2010, the Applicant’s Defense Counsel submitted a Letter of Deficiency to the Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity (NSA) Bahrain requesting the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service. Since an administrative discharge is not punishment, the decision to administratively discharge a service member is made independently of and does not require adjudication at court-martial or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901431

    Original file (MD0901431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200080

    Original file (MD1200080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...