Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200937

Original file (MD1200937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMCR

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120320

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         NONE              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070625     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20070802      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service :
Inactive: Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 26 D a y ( s )
Active: Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 08 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 55
MOS: 8011
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): / Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:    SCM:    SPCM: CC:     Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant requests a change to his narrative reason and contends his recruiter told him not to disclose his asthma.

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 0 301 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any 6105 counseling warnings, non-judicial punishments , or trials by court-martial for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Applicant was discharged for fraudulent entry into military service for not disclosing his pre-service asthmatic condition. Had this information been known by the Marine Corps, it is unlikely that the Applicant would have been allowed to enlist. Based on the fraudulent intent on the part of the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for se paration for fraudulent entry.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant requests a change to his narrative reason and contends his recruiter told him not to disclose his asthma . While at recruit training, the Applicant was diagnosed with Reactive Airway Disease, which was determined to have existed prior to service. While in service, the Applicant said that he had been seen for asthma when he was around age 2 but never took any medication or had further incidents growing up. Both the Applicant and his mother wrote that they disclosed this to his recruiter, who advised him not to mention it since it happened so early in his life without any further incidents or the need to take medication. After a review of the records, the NDRB determined the Applicant did not exhibit any fraudulent intent by not disclosing a single incidence of shortness of breath as a toddler. While the more appropriate discharge narrative reason would have been Erroneous Entry, the Applicant was not notified of this basis for separation, and so the NDRB determined that a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority was warranted. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall change to . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001348

Original file (MD1001348.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Marine Corps could have discharged the Applicant for Fraudulent Enlistment but chose to use Condition Not a Disability as the Narrative Reason for Separation once it was clear that he could not effectively serve.The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300657

Original file (MD1300657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: HONORABLENarrative Reason change to:MEDICAL Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060628 - 20060709Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060710Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060802Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)23 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:74MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NOB/NOBFitness Reports: Awards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900965

Original file (ND0900965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Seeking to reenlist and request my reentry code changed.2. The Applicant is seeking an upgrade in the characterization of her service to Honorable and a change in her narrative reason (unspecified) based on the contention that her discharge was incorrect becauseshe does not have asthma. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300399

Original file (ND1300399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20050831 - 20051107Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20051108Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20051130Highest Rank/Rate:FNLength of Service:Years Months23 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 50EvaluationMarks:Performance:NABehavior:NAOTA: NAAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF:...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200718

Original file (MD1200718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20041215 - 20050724Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050725Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20050901Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)08 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:47MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):N/AFitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200362

Original file (MD1200362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his narrative reason to reenlist.Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901783

Original file (MD0901783.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000442

Original file (MD1000442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included medical history documentation and voluntary statements that clearly substantiate that he did not disclose pertinent information upon his enlistment into the Marine Corps. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201483

Original file (ND1201483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200436

Original file (ND1200436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20101118 - 20110208Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20110209Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20110321Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 13 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 81EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA: N/AAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200937

Similar Decisions