Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200347

Original file (MD1200347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20111122

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: GENERAL

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050329 - 20050912     Active: 20050913 - 20080630 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 200 80701     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20110325      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 24 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 53
MOS: 3531
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (2)

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 20100126 :       Article (Absence without leave, 2 specifications )
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation , 2 specification s)
         Article 107 (False official statement)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

CIVIL ARREST:

- Date not found : Charges: Simple assault

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20091204 :       For unauthorized absence, poor judgment, and continued abuse of alcohol. On 20091106, you were absent from your appointed place of duty as a result of a night of heavy drinking. Previous actions in your continuous poor judgment in your personal affairs resulted in your being recommended for out-patient substance abuse.

- 20100126 :       For violation of A rticle 86 x2, 91, 92 x2, and 107 of the UCMJ.

- 20101102 :       For poor judgment and continued abuse of alcohol. On 20101106, Belton Police department responded to your residence for a domestic disturbance, upon arrival they found you heavily intoxicated and arguing with your spouse. MSgt H_ arrived and escorted you from your residence and placed you in the BEQ for

         the evening. On 20101025 at approximately 0230, the Belton Police department responded to a domestic disturbance at your place of residence. When the police arrived , both you and your wife were heavily intoxicated and arrested by the Belton Police department for domestic assault. MSgt arrived at 0630 at the Belton Police department to take custody of you. MSgt H_ noticed that you were still intoxicated at this time. You attended outpatient alcohol treatment at Springs Behavioral Health System, Colorado Springs, CO from 20100201 to 20100301 due to prior alcohol - related incidents and your pe rsonal request for help.

- 20101214 :       For demonstrating a pattern of mis conduct in that you received a P age 11 for unauthorized absence, poor judgment, and continued alcohol abuse on 20101204. On 20100126 you received NJP for unauthorized absence, disobeying a lawful order, failure to obey regulation , and false official statement. You relapsed and w ere absent from treatment and w ere arrested for simple assault.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 050913 UNTIL 080630 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to be eligible for education benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends he is a recovering alcoholic who is currently in treatment, was discharged for failing Level III alcohol rehabilitation treatment, got into two domestic disturbances but was never found guilty in civilian court, served with dedication, and regrets that his alcoholism got in the way of his service.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 1212          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and prop riety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, two specifications ), Article 91 ( Insubordinate conduct toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, two specifications), and Article 107 (False official statement) , and one civil arrest for simple assault. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to be eligible for education benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of facilitating access to VA benefits. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing educational opportunities or employment opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of the propriety and the equity of a discharge.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends he is a recovering alcoholic who is currently in treatment, was discharged for failing Level III alcohol rehabilitation treatment, got into two domestic disturbances but was never found guilty in civilian court, served with dedication, and regrets that his alcoholism got in the way of his service. The Applicant received an Honorable discharge for his first enlistment from September 2005 to June 2008. Each period of enlistment is an independent obligation and characterization is determined for that specific period of time. A review of the Applicant’s service records reveals that in his second enlistment , although he was notified of administrative separation proceedings for a Pattern of Misconduct and for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, the Separation Authority ultimately discharged him for a Pattern of Misconduct. With his NJP, four retention warnings, and civil arrest, he met the requirements per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual for administrative separation due to a Pattern of Misconduct . The NDRB determined that his alcoholism did not mitigate his misconduct and that he was responsible for his actions. Further, the NDRB determined the discharge was proper and very equitable, as misconduct of this frequency and severity typically results in a characterization of service Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900834

Original file (MD0900834.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20010731 - 20020609Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020610Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20041021Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)12 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:76MOS: 3451Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): (7)/(7)Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): LoA...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400794

Original file (MD1400794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600735

Original file (ND0600735.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Propriety: Basis for discharge did not existEquity: Characterization not warranted by overall service record Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19840215 – 19841215 ELSInactive: USNR...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000222

Original file (ND1000222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the reason for the Applicant’s discharge shall change to Secretarial Authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500530

Original file (ND0500530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Commanding Officer’s comments: Member met the criteria for separation under the provisions of MILPERSMAN 1910-152, Separation by Reasons of Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Failure. The record further reveals that the Applicant completed Level I CAAC alcohol rehabilitation treatment on 20000302 for serious alcohol incidents including showing up late to watch with alcohol on his breath and an arrest for public lewdness and public intoxication. The names, and votes of the members of the Board...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400623

Original file (MD1400623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900068

Original file (MD0900068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By the Applicants statement, he must have been illegally receiving and consuming alcohol against not only Marine Corps policy but CENTCOM policy in order to become addicted and hid his consumption from others in his command. The Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review,...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000967

Original file (ND1000967.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 years from the date...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01127

Original file (MD04-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After I graduate from the academy I plan to work for the Sterling Police Department as an officer.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902169

Original file (MD0902169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. He was twice arrested for underage possession of alcohol (received an enlistment waiver) and continued heavy regular use of alcohol following enlistment. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200347

Similar Decisions