Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101983

Original file (ND1101983.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110822

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       ENTRY LEVEL MEDICAL SEP A RATION

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20090807 - 20100411     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20100412     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100520      Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 09 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 90
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NA Behavior: NA     OTA: NA

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :    S CM :          SPCM: C C :     Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his fibula stress fracture occurred during basic training.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0925 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, non-judicial punishments , or trials by court-martial for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Competent medical authority diagnosed the Applicant as having leg pain due to a previous injury that occurred prior to entering the military. Had this information been known by the Navy, it is unlikely that the Applicant would have been allowed to enlist. Based on an error committed by the Navy, and no fraudulent intent on the part of the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation for E rroneous E ntry. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified coun sel and submit a written statement. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his fibula stress fracture occurred during basic training , and he was improperly diagnosed as having a pre-service medical condition by non-medical personnel. On 11 May 2010, competent medical authority at Recruit Training Command noted “evidence of old healed/healing stress fracture , ” “some thickening of the left proximal fibula and right distal fibula is noted , ” and Applicant “does report increasing running prior to entering recruit training with noted increase in pain. Patient interpreted that pain to be shin splints and thought the pain would resolve over time while here.” After a complete review of the records and the Applicant’s assertions, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the medical diagnosis of a stress fracture that existed prior to entry. Recruit Training Command noted that there was no fraudulent intent on the part of the Applicant , and so he was processed properly for separation due to Erroneous Entry.

An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when s eparation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000242

Original file (MD1000242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 13 January 2003, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for administrative separation and the Applicant was discharged under Honorable conditions with a re-enlistment code of RE-3P (Failure to meet physical/medical standards - Recommended by CO for re-enlistment upon removal ofdisqualifying factor).The Applicant provided her U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim for service-connected compensation results (with enclosures)for the NDRB’s consideration in regards to...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900053

Original file (MD0900053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700098

Original file (MD0700098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Competent medical authority recommended and administrative separation for right leg pain due to stress related injury and the Applicant waived her rights to a Physical Evaluation Board. Due to the fact that the Applicant was notified of Administrative Separation Proceedings within the first 179 days of her service, and the Applicant acknowledged the least favorable characterization of discharge could be an Uncharacterized characterization (without consent with counsel), this discharge...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201008

Original file (MD1201008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600396

Original file (MD0600396.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. During the interval period of 7 months the member has reported no improvement in pain relief and ability to perform regular Marine Corps training. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20030224 by reason of convenience of the government due to condition not a disability (A) with a service...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200658

Original file (MD1200658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

If examination by a medical officer confirms that the Marine is suffering from a physical condition apparently beyond the individual’s control and indicates that the condition is not a disability, initiate separation proceedings per paragraph 6303 or 6304.” Competent medical authority at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego determined his multiple stress fractures were a condition, not a disability and properly initiated separation proceedings.His separation code of JFV1 in Block 26 of his...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401041

Original file (MD1401041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, for some VA benefits, there can be a requirement for a minimum time served on active service.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500242

Original file (MD1500242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301223

Original file (MD1301223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20031106 - 20040606Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040607Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20040802Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:99MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00839

Original file (ND99-00839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Follow up 2 mo for LIMDU re-eval.910715: Ortho: S: Healing left tibia/fibula fracture. In the applicant’s issues 2 and 3, the Board found no evidence that the Navy mishandled the applicant’s injury. The Board disagrees with the applicant’s statement that “since my discharge resulted ultimately from my medical condition, I should have been honorably discharged for medical reasons.” The applicant was discharged for his unauthorized absence of 53 days in lieu of trial by court martial, not...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101983

Similar Decisions