Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101958

Original file (ND1101958.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YNSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110816

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)                 Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20021030     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050415      Highest Rank/Rate: YNSN
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 15 D a y ( s )
         Active   Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 65
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ 1910-122 [PERSONALITY DISORDER] ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.
2.       The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obta in veteran education benefits.
3.       The Applicant claims his wife’s erratic behavior after giving birth and the post-service diagnosis that he did not have a Personality Disorder warrants an upgrade.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 09 14             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Although the Applicant’s service records are incomplete (missing administrative separation documentation to include: NAVPERS 1070/613 counseling retention warning, notification of administrative separation and acknowledgment of rights forms, and the commanding officer endorsement ), the Board completed a thorough review of the available documentation to determine whether discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warnings, commanding officer nonjudicial punishment s (NJP s ), or trial by court s -martial. Since the Applicant’s records are incomplete, the NDRB could not determine to what extent the Applicant’s command assessed his previous performance and conduct, his potential for successful continued service, or the mental health physician’s diagnosis and recommendations prior to processing him for administrative separation. Moreover, s ince t he NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package documentation available for review, it could not determine whether the Applicant exercised or waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review . On 7 April 2005, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be separated from the Navy with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Personality Disorder. The Applicant was discharged on 15 April 2005 as directed.

Issues 1-2: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces and to obtain veteran education benefits. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Issue 3: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant claims his wife’s erratic behavior after giving birth and the post-service diagnosis that he did not have a Personality Disorder warrants an upgrade. Pursuant to Naval Military Personn el Manual Article 1 910-122 , members may be processed for separation based on a mental health professional ’ s clinical diagnosis of a personality disorder when the disorder is so severe that one ’ s ability to function effectively and perform their duties is significantly impaired, and the individual poses a threat to safety or well - being of themselves or others. If a member is diagnosed by a competent mental health professional with a personality disorder and determined to be a danger to himself or others, the requirement for a Page 13 counseling and warning does not apply. The post-service psychiatric assessment by the VA does not say that the Applicant does not have a Personality Disorder. Rather, it says “Deferred,” which indicates there was not enough observation at the time to determine if he had one. Additionally, his wife’s erratic behavior after the birth of their child would not cause a Personality Disorder, which is a long-standing disorder. After a thorough review of

the available record documentation , and with no evidence within the record or submitted by the Applicant to rebut or otherwise question the presumption of regularity in this case, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was proper, equitable, and in accordance with the applicable orders and directives in effect at the time of his separation. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice and r ecord e ntries, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 19 June 2005, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700844

Original file (ND0700844.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was marred by an attempted suicide, her refusal to move onto Base Quarters, and her unwillingness to leave her children behind when her ship would have deployed.An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.Issue 3: (Equity). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700799

Original file (ND0700799.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

The record reflects that the Commanding Officer, USS PEARL HARBOR notified the Applicant of his intent to administratively separate the Applicant by reason of Convenience of the government – Personality Disorder per MILPERSMAN 1910-122 and that the least favorable characterization of service possible was General (Under Honorable Conditions). Discharge Process Date Notified: 20030114 Reason for Discharge: - Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501043

Original file (ND1501043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) PERSONALITY DISORDER Reenlistment Code: RE-4 Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-122 [PERSONALITY DISORDER] Frequently you demonstrate a negative attitude in the office by not attempting to show any interest in working in the Admin Department. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001208

Original file (ND1001208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s discharge, based on the diagnosis, was proper and warranted.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001122

Original file (ND1001122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Separation Authority reviewed the evidence of record and evaluation and determined that Personality Disorder was the most appropriate narrative reason for discharge.As such, the NDRB determined no impropriety in the discharge action; the proper narrative reason for separation from the Naval Service was - Convenience of the Government (Personality Disorder). Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400569

Original file (ND1400569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301529

Original file (ND1301529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge narrative reason should be changed to “medical. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201612

Original file (ND1201612.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she was a good Sailor with no misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000663

Original file (ND1000663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HARDSHIP Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20041105 - 20050619Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050620Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070405Highest Rank/Rate:YNSNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 60EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.0(1)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900891

Original file (ND0900891.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101958

Similar Decisions