Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101619

Original file (ND1101619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110621

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20001121 - 20001218     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20001219     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20010125      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth 07 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 44
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NONE         Behavior: NONE OTA: NONE

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE Retention Warning Counseling : NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB note d an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERSMAN 1910-130 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 24, effective 20 May 1999 until 12 June 2001, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks to change his reenlistment code in order to enlist in the Army National Guard.
2 .       The Applicant contends he was the victim of an attempted sexual assault while at recruit training and was wrongly diagnosed with anxiety disorder .

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0821             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. The Applicant w a s administratively processed for separation from Recruit Training Command (RT C ) Great Lakes following a diagnosis of anxiety disorder not otherwise specified . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to change his reenlistment code in order to enlist in the Army National Guard. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . While at RT C , the Applicant had an encounter with another male recruit who attempted to sexually assault him . The Applicant contends that his anxiety following this incident was normal and that he had never been treated for anxiety prior to this incident. The record shows that the Applicant was referred to Recruit Mental Health by a c hapl a in and that he was diagnosed with anxiety disorder . It was determined by Mental Health that the Applicant had been sexually abused by his older brother frequently from the age of 6 to 12 years old , and he was recommended for entry level separation due to a disqualifying psychiatric condition. The Applicant was counseled on not being eligible for reenlistment due to “abuse when child” on 25 January 2001 , and he signed his counseling sheet. The record indicates the government acted properly and equitably in discharging the Applicant. As the Applicant’s time in service was under 180 days, his discharge is properly Uncharacterized (Entry Level Separation). Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102170

Original file (ND1102170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030828 - 20030923Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030924Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20060623Highest Rank/Rate:ANLength of Service: Years Months00 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 55EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.3(3)Behavior:3.7(3)OTA: 3.5Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM SSDR GWOTSM...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300258

Original file (ND1300258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20100517 - 20100912Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100913Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20111216Highest Rank/Rate:AZANLength of Service:YearMonths04 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.93Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Period of CONF:...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400011

Original file (MD1400011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100540

Original file (ND1100540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the medical and service records and determined that there was no impropriety or inequity in the diagnosis or the discharge proceedings. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101722

Original file (ND1101722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change to his RE Code.2. Representation: none By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000315

Original file (ND1000315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The narrative reason for discharge listed on his DD-214 states “erroneous entry (other),” which reflects that if the service had known of existing information or conditions related to the service member at the time of enlistment, the service member would not have been allowed to enter into military service. The Applicant’s service was not so meritorious as to warrant an Honorable discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601073

Original file (MD0601073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [REQUESTED BY MEMBER] Discharge Process:Date Member Requested Separation:20010807Member Requested Separation Due To: Characterization Requested: member Recognized Least Favorable:Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): , (UNDATED) SJA review (date): (20010813)Discharge directed by (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING, CHERRY POINT, NC (20010813)Narrative reason directed:IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIALCharacterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800793

Original file (MD0800793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000976

Original file (ND1000976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080314 - 20080630Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080701Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080821Highest Rank/Rate:FRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)21 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF: NJP:SCM:SPCM:CC: Retention...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401087

Original file (ND1401087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101619

Similar Decisions