Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101581

Original file (ND1101581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110614

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620280

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19960928 - 19961225     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19961226     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19970110      Highest Rank/Rate: S R
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 15 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NONE         Behavior: NONE OTA: NONE

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE

Retention Warning Counseling : 1

- 19961227 :       For failure to disclose speeding ticket prior to enlistment

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 11 December 1997, Article 3620280, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTIONS – ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to re-enlist in the Armed Forces.
2 .       The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he was confused and not focusing and was immature .

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0822             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning . The Applicant was diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder shortly after arriving at recruit training. Based on the diagnosis, his command administratively processed him for separation. Instead of processing the Applicant for Personality Disorder, however, the Navy processed him for Erroneous Entry (Other), suggesting that the Applicant would never had been enlisted if the Navy knew about his disorder prior to enlistment. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a statement . The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) . The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to re-enlist in the Armed Forces and seeks a change in his RE-code. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he was confused and not focusing and was immature . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcomi ng this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. Lacking any evidence of a medically diagnosed state of mental confusion or lack of focus , the NDRB is unable to establish this contention as a basis for mitigation or consideration as an extenuating circumstance. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. The Applicant was diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder and was properly and equitably discharged. The NDRB recognizes that many of our servicemembers are young at the time they enlist for service, however, most still manage to serve honorably. While some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of immaturity to be a mitigating factor or a sufficient reason for misconduct. Relief denied.

An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when s eparation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 y ears from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200070

Original file (ND1200070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19970313 - 19970811Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19970812Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19970911Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Years Month00 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 38EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF:...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801216

Original file (ND0801216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the Board determined the characterization of service was also appropriate based on the evidence of record. The NDRB advises the Applicant that, with respect to nonservice related administrative matters, i.e. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000314

Original file (ND1000314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19961024 - 19961105Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19961106Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19961209Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)04 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 41EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001103

Original file (ND1001103.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s medical condition, command administratively processed for separation. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT (OTHER). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901399

Original file (ND0901399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ERRONEOUS ENTRY (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601020

Original file (ND0601020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USNND06-01020Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060725Narrative Reason for Separation: Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN3620280Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: RTC GREAT LAKES ILApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to:Characterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20 The Discharge shall change : Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:Regarding equity, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800097

Original file (ND0800097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801000

Original file (ND0801000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901292

Original file (ND0901292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19950313 - 19950726Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19950727Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19950814Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)18 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 84EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700110

Original file (ND0700110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the Applicant’s condition that resulted in the characterization of discharge. NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING OFFICER, RECRUIT TRAINING COMMAND (20000331)Reason for discharge directed: -DUE TO...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101581

Similar Decisions