Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101316

Original file (ND1101316.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LSSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110426

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         NONE              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080221     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100811      Highest Rank/Rate: LSSN
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
         Active   Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 62
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.34

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol ESWS

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present,
Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Applicant contends her discharge was improper as she had been prescribed medication for dental surgery.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 10 20 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warnings, commanding officer nonjudicial punishment, or trial by courts-martial. The Applicant a pre-service waiver for illegal drug use prior to entering the Navy. However, b ased on the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession of a controlled substance) violation (evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB msg 12 Jul 2010 , codeine 28 , 848 ng/ml and morphine 14 , 998 ng/ml) , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory per the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) . The Applicant was notified, via certified mail, of pending administrative separation processing using the procedure on or about 7 May 2010. However, th e NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package acknowledgment of rights form to determine whether the Applicant exercised or waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative separation board . On 27 Jul 2010, the Commander, Navy Personnel Command directed that the Applicant be s eparated from the Navy with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse). The Applicant was subsequently discharged as directed on 11 Aug 2010.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her discharge was improper as she had been prescribed medication for dental surgery. The NDRB conducted a detailed examination of the records and found two items of correspondence of particular interest to the Board. The first, dated 21 Jan 2011 (more than five months after the Applicant’s discharge), was a memorandum from the NAVDRUGLAB to the Applicant’s Navy Operational Support Center (NOSC) Commanding Officer (CO) that stated that the codeine and/or morphine metabolites identified in the Applicant’s urine sample could have come from prescription medication (i.e. Tylenol with codeine); however, the memo also stated that its intention was not to cite prescription med ications as the specific cause of the positive test results in this case since that is a command responsibility via appropriate investigation . The second item of correspondence, dated 3 Feb 2011, was a copy of an e - mail indicating the Applicant’s NOSC CO, after considering further documentation from t he NAVDRUGLAB, had decided to assist the Applicant in reversing her administrative separation from the Navy. The Board, after careful consideration of all the available evidence, to include information received from her previous commanding officer, found that the Applicant’s issue warranted relief.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall change to .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301889

Original file (ND1301889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 28 March 2012, Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS 913) directed NOSC Houston to discharge the Applicant with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve with a Reenlistment Code of RE-4 (Not Recommended for Reenlistment) and a Separation Code of JHJ (No Board Entitlement). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901601

Original file (MD0901601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501088

Original file (MD0501088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Something Good (If possible).” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I Thank you for your time, & would want my RE code eligable to Join the Air Force.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant,...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300214

Original file (ND1300214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301704

Original file (ND1301704.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030228-20030908Active: 20030909-20070908 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070909Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20121218Highest Rank/Rate:BU2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 10 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.4(5)Behavior:3.2(5)OTA: 3.40Awards...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400667

Original file (ND1400667.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401649

Original file (ND1401649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change to his RE-code.2. The Applicant contends he was wrongly discharged from a drilling status.The Applicant contends he was either present for the annotated missed drills or they were authorized absences. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801285

Original file (ND0801285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Illegal drug use cannot be tolerated by any member of the U. S. Navy regardless of grade or time in service and is a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) as a violation of Article 112a (Drug use). The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriateAfter a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM:...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002247

Original file (MD1002247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The NDRB has no...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901477

Original file (ND0901477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20000421 - 20000426Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000427Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20001201Highest Rank/Rate:ARLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)05 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 55EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 1.17Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101316

Similar Decisions