Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101057

Original file (ND1101057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-BMSR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110321

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20000606 - 20000712     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20000713     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050829      Highest Rank/Rate: BM3
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth 17 D ays
Education Level:        AFQT: 34
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.2 ( 5 )      Behavior: 2.8 ( 5 )        OTA: 2.95

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NDSM GWOTEM GWOTSM SSDR NUC NAVY “ E ” (3) GCM

Periods of UA : 20050307-20050516, 70 days, 20050520-20050525, 5 days , 20050623-20050722, 29 days / CONF: NFIR

NJP : 1
- 20011005 :      Article 91 (Disrespect toward a chief petty officer)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended:

S CM : 2
- 200 1 0720 :      Article 86 (Absence without leave 20010517-20010618, 3 1 days )
         Article 87 (Missing movement)
         Sentence: CONF 30 days

- 20050525:      Article 86 (Absence without leave, UA)
         Article 87 (Missing movement)
         Sentence: RIR CONF 30 days

SPCM: NONE        C C : NONE

Retention Warning Counseling: 1
- 20011111 :      For unauthorized absence and missing movement.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214
The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214:

         Grade, Rate, or Rank, should read: “ BMSR ”
         “ E1 ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) ”
         “ 01 MAY 17 - 01 JUN 18, 05 MAR 07 - 05 MAY 16, 05 MAY 17 -05 JUN 17, 0 5 JUN 23 - 05 JUL 22 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 11 June 2008, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 86 (UA in excess of 30 days) and 87 (Missing ship’s movement) .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant did not state any issues.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0523 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant did not identify any decisional issues to the Board. However, the Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 91 ( Disrespect toward a chief petty officer , 1 specification ) . It also included t wo summary court s -martial (SCM) for violation s of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Absence without leave, 2 specifications) and Article 87 (Missing movement, 2 specifications). The Applicant had two periods of Unauthorized Absence (70 days and 5 days) that occurred prior to the SCM proceeding held on 25 May 2005. A 29-day period of UA following the 25 May 2005 SCM proceedings was not adjudicated at NJP or court-martial proceedings. B ased on the offenses committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether the Applicant waived his rights to c onsult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

Issue 1: (Non-decisional) The Applicant did not state any issues. There is no law, or regulation, that authorizes a discharge to be automatically upgraded after six months. The NDRB does not automatically upgrade discharge s .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801911

Original file (ND0801911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020617 - 20021103Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20021104Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20060509Highest Rank/Rate:ABHANLength of Service: Years Months08 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.0(1)OTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM GWOTSMPeriods...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900246

Original file (ND0900246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800672

Original file (ND0800672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The member’s command did not seek a punitive discharge in this case but chose an administrative discharge instead.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901331

Original file (ND0901331.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500968

Original file (MD1500968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

I understand that waiving my right to an administrative discharge board will likely result in my receiving a discharge Under Other Than Honorable conditions from the Marine Corps.” Regarding the above statement of rights, the NDRB found that the Applicant was not discharged for commission of a serious offense due to his period of unauthorized absence, but for pleading guilty at Summary Court-Martial for Article 87 (Missing movement). Summary: After a thorough review of the available...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601034

Original file (ND0601034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Wrongfully use cocaine on 19920925.19921024: Additional charge referred to special court-martial, to be tried together with charges referred on 19921007.19921029: Applicant to unauthorized absence 2100.30: Applicant missed movement.19921109: Applicant from unauthorized absence 0900 (11 days/surrendered).19921215: Special Court Martial [19921125 and 19921221]: Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Specification: Unauthorized absence 19920812 until on or about 19920923. Whenever a...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601132

Original file (ND0601132.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

20000218: DD-214 issued, Applicant discharged with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization: NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel NOT FOUND IN RECORD Administrative Board Obtain Copies NOT...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301164

Original file (ND1301164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to reenlist.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000393

Original file (ND1000393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301674

Original file (ND1301674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his overall service was honorable, and he only had one incident of misconduct.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101057

Similar Decisions