Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100797

Original file (ND1100797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AO3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110207

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20050928 - 20051004     Active:          20000914 - 20031001

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20051006     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100522      Highest Rank/Rate: AO3
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.8 ( 6 )      Behavior: 2.1 ( 6 )        OTA: 2.78
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol KCM ACM ASR

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :
- 20070730 :      Article (Disorderly conduct, drunkenness)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20080429 :      Article (Failure to obey a lawful order or regulation)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

- 20100112 :      Article (UA , on or about 1900, 20091225 and did remain so until at or about 2015, 20091225 )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20070730 :       For disorderly conduct, drunkenness
- 20080429 :       For violation of UCMJ, Article 92: F ailure to obey a lawful order or regulation

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214
The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

“ 04 07 17 ”
“ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 000914 UNTIL 031001 ”
         “ GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) ”
         “ MILPERSMAN 1910-140 ”
         “ JKA ”
         “ PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT ”

         The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits.
2.       The Applicant thought he was treated unfairly by his command.

Decision

Date : 2012 0313             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure the pertinent standards of equity and propriety were met. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( , , 1900, 20091225 - 2015, 20091225 ), Article ( Failure to obey an order or regulation , ), and Article ( Article , 1 specification: D isorderly conduct, drunkenness ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised his right to consult with a qualified counsel, but rights to submit a written statement and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not provide a foundation to grant relief.

: ( Nond ecisional) The Applicant contends he was treated unfairly by his command. The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s service record. During his enlistment, he had two Page 13 retention warnings and three NJPs for a variety of UCMJ violations. Per Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT , “m embers may be separated when during the current enlistment they have : (1): two or more nonjudicial punishments, court-martials, or civil convictions (or combination thereof); (2) three or more unauthorized absences, each is more than 3 days, but less than 30 days duration; (3) a set pattern of failure to pay just debts; or (4) a set pattern of failure to contribute adequate support to dependents; and (5) violated a NAVPERS 1070/613 counseling/warning.” With his second NJP in April 2008, he met the requirements for separation due to a Pattern of Misconduct, however, his command opted to retain him for further service. A third NJP in January 2010 resulted in the command’s decision to separate the Applicant for a Pattern of Misconduct. Further, the command recommended the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service instead of the more common Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge awarded to servicemembers with a Pattern of Misconduct. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s command went out of its way to be fair to the Applicant and gave him multiple opportunities to correct his inappropriate behavior. Even when his command determined that he was no longer fit for Naval Service, the command recommended a lenient characterization of service. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000678

Original file (ND1000678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave, UA 20070719 – 20070730), Article (Missing movement, missed sailing of USS Tarawa on 20070723), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, wrongfully having a personal relationship...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900801

Original file (MD0900801.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

When notified for Administrative Separation Processing, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with qualified counsel and submit a written statement.Per the Commanding General, Headquarters, Fourth Marine Aircraft Wing letter 1900 of 17 May 2008, the Applicant was approved for separation with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service, a JFX1 (Personality Disorder) separation code, and an RE-3P reenlistment code.Issue 1:(Decisional) () .The Applicant contends his...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01388

Original file (ND04-01388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. An upgrade of the Applicant's discharge to an honorable characterization is not warranted. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400764

Original file (ND1400764.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100869

Original file (ND1100869.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall PATTERN OF...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902367

Original file (ND0902367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends his discharge is unfair and improper.Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, 29 April 2005 until 14 May 2008, Article 1910-152, SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE states that the characterization of separation should be Honorable unless otherwise warranted. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201808

Original file (MD1201808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Over the next 14 months, he received another retention warning and was found guilty of additional charges at a second Summary Court-Martial before being found guilty at a Special Court-Martial for violating UCMJ Article 112a for using marijuana. After a review of the records, the NDRB found no basis for clemency. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200029

Original file (ND1200029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301763

Original file (ND1301763.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101709

Original file (ND1101709.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:RE4/JPD Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19941021 - 19950501Active:USNR (DEP)19950509 - 19951204 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19951205Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19981231Highest Rank/Rate:AO3Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 27 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 67EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 3.43Awards and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100797

Similar Decisions