Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100471

Original file (ND1100471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-CTOSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20101214

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20010815 - 20010823     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20010824     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20041101      Highest Rank/Rate: CTOSN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 08 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 77
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.50

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20020628 :       No specific information found in record [ Date e xtracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 20041004]

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         DECORATIONS, MEDALS, BADGES, CITATIONS AND CAMPAIGN RIBBONS AWARDED OR AUTHORIZED, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NATO MEDAL ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1.        The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code.
2.       The Applicant contends he was told in Naples that he would receive a General discharge, but when he got to Norfolk, his records were misplaced, and he was forced to sign acceptance of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge.

Decision
Date : 201 20109             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure the pertinent standards of equity and propriety were met. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning. His record of service also includes administrative message 111120Z AUG 04 NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville, FL that shows his positive urinalysis sample test result for cocaine, 366 ng/ml. Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to c onsult with a qualified counsel , however , he waived his rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends he was told in Naples that he would receive a General discharge, but when he got to Norfolk, his records were misplaced, and he was forced to sign acceptance of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. According to documentation in the Applicant’s service record, in the separation package that Transient Personnel Unit, Norfolk forwarded to the Separation Authority (Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic), he recommended that the Applicant be separated with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service based upon the recommendation of the Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Naples, Italy. However, the Separation Authority, who has final authority as to the characterization of service, directed that the Applicant be separated with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service. The NDRB found that there was no impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700863

Original file (ND0700863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)2000731 - 20010205Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010206Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20020215Length of Service: 1 Yrs 0Mths10 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801614

Original file (ND0801614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade founded upon these circumstances would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700041

Original file (MD0700041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning, one nonjudicial punishment for Articles 117, 128, and 134, and a guilty finding and sentence at a Special Court-Martial for Articles 128 and 134. SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORD Basis for discharge directed: NOT FOUND IN...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601184

Original file (ND0601184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Separation: By ,Recommendation on Characterization: By , GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDTITIONS)Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19951121)Separation Authority (date):Chief of Naval Personnel (19951228)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed:Date Applicant Discharged: 19960109 Additional Information Considered by Board Type of documentation submitted by the Applicant and considered by the Board Document Type #Pages Related to Period of Service Under...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601009

Original file (ND0601009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

NAVAL FORCE, EUROPE 20050831 Narrative reason directed:Characterization of directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20051007 Additional Information Considered by Board Type of documentation submitted by the Applicant and considered by the Board Document Type #Pages Related to Period of Service:Service/Medical Record:297Other Period of Service: 0Related to Post-Service Period: Community Service:0Education: 0 Employment: 0Health/Medical:0 Character Statements: 0 Criminal Records...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700986

Original file (ND0700986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001635

Original file (ND1001635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant desires a change to his re-enlistment code. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601004

Original file (ND0601004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: By a vote of the Characterization shall . Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20040922 (BY CERTIFIED MAIL)Narrative Reason(s): UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN the READY RESERVELeast Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: PRESUMEDDate...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301704

Original file (ND1301704.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030228-20030908Active: 20030909-20070908 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070909Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20121218Highest Rank/Rate:BU2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 10 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.4(5)Behavior:3.2(5)OTA: 3.40Awards...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700871

Original file (ND0700871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the record does not contain a copy of the Applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, it was referenced in the Separation Authority’s action and the Board found sufficient evidence in the record to conclude that the reason for discharge was factually based. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the Applicant has not provided sufficient...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100471

Similar Decisions