Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100406
Original file (ND1100406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AC2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20101109
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20040816 - 20050320     Active:            20050321 - 20090104

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20090105     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100408 (in absentia)        Highest Rank/Rate: AC2
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 04 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 88
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.22
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) ESWS

Periods of UA /C ONF :       UA: 20100406-20100408 ( 2 days )            CONF:

NJP:
- 20100108 :      Article (Drugs - methamphetamine , o/o 20091024 )
         Awarded: RIR (to E-4) FOP Suspended: RIR (suspend 6 months)

SCM:     SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, NAVY "E" RIBBON, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, FLAG LETTER OF COMMENDATION, ENLISTED SURFACE WARFARE SPECIALIST ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
          From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Applicant contends in-service sexual trauma mitigates the misconduct for which she was separated.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 11 16             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did reflect one for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance, D-amphetamine, o/o 24 Oct 2009, via a friend’s prescription medication - A dderall). Since the Applicant did not reveal her prior illegal marijuana use during enlistment accession processing, she did not have a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Navy. However, documentation within the medical records indicates she used marijuana while in college prior to enlisting. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory per the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure on 1 Feb 2010 , the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel, submit a written statement , and request an administrative separation board . On 12 Feb 2010, the Applicant’s Commanding Officer submitted a request to the Separation Authority (Commander, Navy Region Hawaii) for administrative separation of the Applicant with a recommendation of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse). On 3 Mar 2010, the Separation Authority directed the Applicant be discharged as requested. While awaiting administrative separation, the Applicant was reported in an unauthorized absence (UA) status on 6 Apr 2010. On 8 Apr 2010, t he Applicant was separated from the Navy (in absentia) as directed by the Separation Authority.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends in-service sexual trauma mitigates the misconduct for which she was separated. Despite a service member’s prior record of se rvice, certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the N aval S er vice in order to maintain good order and discipline ; violation of Article 112a meets this standard . The Applicant signed the US N Drug Policy on 30 Jul and 16 Aug 2004 . She was fully aware there is a zero - tolerance policy for drug abuse , and s he acknowledged the consequences. The Applicant claims on her DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge) that she had been raped by two Sailors in her previous command aboard the USS Enterprise. However, after a detailed examination of the Applicant’s evaluation reports and medical and service records, the Board could find no evidence of rape, trauma, or similar event s, or even changes in her performance . The Board did note that the Applicant had separated from her spouse and had been assigned to Marine Corps Air Station Kaneohe Bay , Hawaii in Jan 2009 after completing a tour aboard the USS Enterprise. During the Aug-Sep 2009 timeframe, she terminated her pregnancy and then later tested positive for D-amphetamine during a unit urinalysis in October 2009. She was referred for a drug dependency evaluation and subsequently determined to not be dependent. Evidence in the record indicates the Applicant continued to illegally consume the prescription medication (roommate’s A dderall) after the urinalysis test. On 27 Dec 2009, she again tested positive for D-amphetamine and was referred for another drug dependency evaluation. However, a full evaluation could not be conducted because she refused to engage/participate in further counseling. On 8 Feb 20 10 , the Applicant began outpatient rehabilitation treatment (Level I). Within two weeks, the Applicant was diagnosed as alcohol dependent and scheduled to commence intensive in-patient/out-patient rehabilitation treatment (Level II.5) on or about 22 Feb 2010. Unfortunately, during the first day of treatment, she stopped participating and departed from the facility.

The Applicant claims personal stress ors were the underlying cause s of h er misconduct . However, the record of service indicates her misconduct was willful and demonstrated s he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for h er conduct or s he should not be held accountable for h er actions. When a Sailor’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under H onorable conditions. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions d ischarge is warranted when a Sailor commits or omits an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a member of the Naval Service . The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Sailors , especially considering her grade and length of service , and f alls short of w hat is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present,
Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001370

    Original file (ND1001370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 04 June 2004, the Separation Authority directed the Applicant’s discharge with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse); he further directed that the Applicant be assigned an RE-4 re-entry code (not recommended for reenlistment).The Applicant provided additional documentation ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001172

    Original file (ND1001172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority reviewed the Command’s recommendation for separation; determining that the Applicant’s documented record of misconduct in service established the minimum requirements for discharge based on a pattern of misconduct; that separation in the Applicant’s case was warranted; and further, that the proposed characterization of service - General (Under Honorable Conditions) - was warranted. The Separation Authority directed the Applicant be discharged for the reason as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301831

    Original file (ND1301831.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends her discharge notice said that she was to receive treatment if she was determined to be drug/alcohol dependent, and yet she never received this treatment, which would have been considered a treatment failure and not misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200475

    Original file (ND1200475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201308

    Original file (ND1201308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080730 - 20090201Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20090202Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100408Highest Rank/Rate:HTFNLength of Service:YearMonths7 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 42EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of CONF: NJP:-...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500909

    Original file (ND1500909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001164

    Original file (ND1001164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since 15 years from the date of the Applicant’s discharge has elapsed, she is not eligible for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600662

    Original file (ND0600662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)Applicant’s Statement PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20030926 - 20031026 COG Active: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600010

    Original file (ND0600010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I want an honorable discharge for my service. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400258

    Original file (ND1400258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, as a result of the PTSD claim, the NDRB included a psychiatrist on the board.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the...