Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100218

Original file (ND1100218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FTSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20101102

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19960625 - 19960818     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960819     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19981216      Highest Rank/Rate: FT3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 87
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 1.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 2.43

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle SSBN Deterrent Patrol Insignia (1/Patrol)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:

- 19981207 :      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substance) [Extracted from Evaluation Report and Counseling Record of 19981003-19981216]
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 December 1997 until
19 May 1999, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Applicant wants his discharge upgraded so he can reenlist in the military.
2.       Applicant contends he never tested positive for drugs.
3.       Applicant contends he was not afforded legal counsel.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 1129             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service did include one non-judicial punishment for violations of the UCMJ : Article ( Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article ( Wrongful use, or possession, of a controlled substance , ) . The Applicant had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Nondecisional ) The Applicant wants his discharge upgraded so he can reenlist in the military. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, it is not authorized to change an RE code. An unfavorable RE code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he never tested positive for drugs . Although the Applicant might have never tested positive for illegal drug use, documentation provided by the Applicant indicates he does admit to possessing drug paraphernalia based on his description of the device that was found in his backpack . Wrongful possession of drug paraphernalia is a drug - related offense that requires mandatory processing for administrative separation under Naval Military Personnel Manual Chapter 1910-146. Therefore, even if the Applicant never tested positive for drugs, the NDRB determined his discharge for misconduct due to drug abuse based on possession of drug paraphernalia was proper. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he was not afforded legal counsel. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his claim. There is no evidence in the record to support his contention that he was not afforded his right to consult with qualified legal counsel. His statement alone does not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Therefore, based on the presumption of regularity, the NDRB concluded that the Applicant was given an opportunity to exercise h is rights and that h is discharge was conducted properly. Relief denied.

The Applicant also stated that he received a Good Conduct Medal. This is incorrect. To be awarded a Good Conduct Medal, a servicemember must serve for three years without misconduct. The Applicant served for just under 2 years and 4 months and received punishment at an NJP. The confusion likely arose from the Applicant’s awards page from his service record that has an entry after his NJP on 7 December 1998 that reset the 3-year counter for the Good Conduct Medal.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100875

Original file (ND1100875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400843

Original file (MD1400843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s command agreed to his request, and the Applicant was administratively separated from the Marine Corps Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501118

Original file (MD1501118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An Administrative Separation Board was convened on 28 May 2013 and determined by unanimous vote (3-0) that a preponderance of evidenced supported the Applicant’s drug possession, and recommended the Applicant be discharged from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for reason of Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400613

Original file (MD1400613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001499

Original file (MD1001499.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000320

Original file (MD1000320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.After a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the Applicant’s discharge and the discharge process, the NDRB found no issues of impropriety or inequity.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100728

Original file (ND1100728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070530 - 20070620Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070621Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090623Highest Rank/Rate: OSSNLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 3 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 57EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(4)Behavior:2.3(4)OTA: 2.88Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900672

Original file (MD0900672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100214

Original file (ND1100214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070810 - 20070926Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070927Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20081113Highest Rank/Rate: SKSALength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)17 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 44EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(2)Behavior:2.0(2)OTA: 2.59Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201208

Original file (ND1201208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants an upgrade for education benefits and reenlistment.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100218

Similar Decisions