Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100497

Original file (MD1100497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20101217

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20071215 - 20071218     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20071219     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20090817      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 29 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
MOS: 0151
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 20090310 :      Article (Failure to go to appointed place of duty, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: 20090212
         Specification 2: 20090217
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20090721 :      Article (Absent from appointed place of duty, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: 20090624
         Specification 2: 20090717
         Article (Failed to drive with drivers insurance policy)
         Article 134 (Disrespectful, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Toward SNCOIC
         Specification 2: Toward NCOIC
         Article 123 a (Wrote check with insufficient funds)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20090731 :      Article (Failure to go to appointed place of duty on 20090723)
         Article (Failed to start a housing allotment when told to do so)
         Article (Wrote a check with the intention to defraud)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20081217 :       For unauthorized absence on 20081126 by failing to report for section PT at 0530 as instructed. Furthermore, at 0830, Marines from your section were sent to residence after you failed to report for work at 0730. You have demonstrated a pattern of misconduct given that this was the third incident of unauthorized absence within a period of 90 days. This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated by any Marine.

- 20090310 :       For two specifications of unauthorized absence on 20090212 and 20090217. This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

- 20090722 :       For two specifications of unauthorized absence in that you were not at your appointed place of duty on 20090624 and 20090717 , failure to obey order or regulation in that you failed to drive with valid drivers insurance , showing disrespect toward your SNCOIC, and you wrote a check without sufficient funds. This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated .

- 20090731 :       For unauthorized absence on 0730, 20090723, failing to start a housing allotment, and writing a bad check with the intent to defraud.

- 20090917 :       For failing to take prescription medication directed by a medical officer on 20090331. This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant desires to re-enlist in the military.
2.       The Applicant contends a sleep disorder, misunderstanding of his comments, and financial har dship mitigate his misconduct.
3.       Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date : 2012 0214             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Unauthorized absence, ), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications), Article ( Writing checks with insufficient funds , ), and Article ( Article , : disrespect toward his SNCOIC and NCOIC ). Based on the , command administratively processed for separation . When notified of administrative separation processing, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant desires to re-enlist in the military. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends a sleep disorder, misunderstanding of his comments, and financial hardship mitigate his misconduct. The Applicant claims his periods of unauthorized absence s (UA) were due to a sleep disorder. He contends his comments were taken out of context and resulted in NJP for disrespectful conduct when no disrespect was intended. He further contends he wrote checks with insufficient funds due to financial hardship. The Applicant submitted no credible documentation or evidence to substantiate any of his claims. The record contained no indication of any mitigating circumstances for his misconduct and shows repeated and willful misconduct. The NDRB found the Applicant’s issue to be without merit. Relief denied.

Issue 3: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant submitted two letters of character reference. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement, evidence of financial stability and continuous employment, and three character references. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. To warrant an upgrade, the Applicant’s post-service efforts need to be more encompassing. T he Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100108

Original file (MD1100108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300889

Original file (MD1300889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

With six retention warnings, three NJPs, and a Summary Court-Martial in his 2 years and 9 months of service, the Applicant met the requirements for administrative separation for a Pattern of Misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900718

Original file (MD0900718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

You knowing and willingly accepted an unauthorized phone call thus violating a Military Protection Order. Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01137

Original file (MD02-01137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD02-01137 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020809, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940623 - 950312 COG Period of Service...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000052

Original file (MD1000052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, administrative separation process, and documentary evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews :...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601155

Original file (MD0601155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Suspended for 6months.Not appealed.19991101: Administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct was approved by CG, 2dFSSG. 20000209: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 1301, 20000121 to 0945, 20000202 (11 days). 20000214: Vacation of suspended administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101277

Original file (MD1101277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901900

Original file (MD0901900.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901417

Original file (MD0901417.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. On 25 October 2008, the Separation Authority approved the command's recommendation for separation and directed the Applicant be discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for Misconduct due to drug abuse pursuant to paragraph 6210.5 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual. The NDRB...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800787

Original file (MD0800787.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The evidence of record as documented in a special court-martial is considered fact and nowhere is it stated in the member’s service record he was not responsible for his conduct or he should not be held accountable for his actions.When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate based on these violations.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100497

Similar Decisions