Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100465
Original file (MD1100465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20101214
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to: or                                     uncharacterized or under other than honorable                      conditions
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20051230 - 20060123     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060124     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20081125      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 89
MOS: 0481
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 2.5 ( ) / 2.2 ( )      Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (2) MM (2)

Periods of UA : 20080115-20080127 (13 days)

NJP:

- 20070515 :       Article (UA , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: 0730 on or about 20070404
         Specification 2: 0700 on or about 20070508
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     CC:

SPCM:

- 20080109 :      Article (UA) , 2 specifications
         Specification 1: on or about 20070702 - 20070731
         Specification 2: on or about 20070806 - 20071102, ( apprehended )
         Art icle (Wrongful use of a controlled substance - cocaine )
         Sentence : 80 days (200 71102 - 20080106, 66 days pre-tria l confinement)

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20070517 :       For violation of Article 8 6 , 2 specifications





Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          DATES OF TIME LOST DURING THIS PERIOD , should read: “ (13) 20080115-20080127, (66) 20071101-20080101, (88) 20070806-20071101, (29) 20070702-20070730 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant s eeks clemency stating that stress from trauma overseas mitigates his misconduct.
2.       The Applicant contends his record of service outweighs his misconduct.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0517            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant ’ s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts . The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized a bsence , 2 specific ation s ), and S pecial C ourt- M artial for of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Unauthorized a bsence , 2 specific ation s) and Article 112a ( Wrongful use of a controlled substance - cocaine) . The Applicant did not have a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Marine Corps . Based on the Applican t’s conviction and sentence at S pecial C ourt- M artial, he was confined, reduced in rank, and discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant s eeks clemency stating that stress from trauma overseas mitigates his misconduct. In addition to being found guilty of using cocaine at a Special Court-Martial, the Applicant also had multiple violations of UCMJ Article 86, including periods of 13, 88, and 29 days of unauthorized absence. There is nothing in the Applicant’s records to suggest that he attempted to use the various services available to Marines who experience stress, such as the chaplain, mental or medical health professionals, or family services. Also, there is no indication in the Applicant’s records, nor has the Applicant provided any documentation, that he was or is suffering from stress related to his service in Iraq. Without documentation, t he NDRB found that his service was equitably characterized. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant described several positive aspects of his service, including service in Fallujah, Iraq, multiple Meritorious Masts, a Certificate of Appreciation, a diploma for achievement in his MOS, and a letter from a fellow Marine who served in Iraq with the Applicant. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Marine Corps to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Articles 86 and 1 12a of the UCMJ are such offenses. Multiple u nauthorized absence s and wrongful use, possession, etc . of a controlled substance can result in an unfavorable characterization of discharge, or at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant ’ s discharge was equitable and no more severe than the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances and with similar service in a combat zone . Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900264

    Original file (ND0900264.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT – SERIOUS OFFENSE.Discussion : This petition is somewhat ambiguous as it is not clear what the Applicant is seeking in her request for a “ reset of my military record ” . ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900477

    Original file (MD0900477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6203.3 CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present. ”...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901077

    Original file (MD0901077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior to entering the Marine Corps, the Applicant acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs on 7 July 2006.Based on the offenses committed, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Marines, regardless of his grade and length of service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101926

    Original file (MD1101926.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable, because it was based on an isolated incident, and the Marine Corps retained him for a second tour in Iraq.When a servicemember reaches the end of active obligated service, the characterization of service depends solely on average Proficiency and Conduct markings. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902436

    Original file (MD0902436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901020

    Original file (ND0901020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded based on his record of service, which was good apart from a period of misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900489

    Original file (MD0900489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.Besides the Applicant’s DD Form 293 and documents from his service of record, no additional documentation was provided for review. After a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301286

    Original file (ND1301286.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901105

    Original file (MD0901105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Non-decisional. The Applicant provided no evidence that he was not given his full legal rights or advised on the consequences of his discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000818

    Original file (MD1000818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was provided both directed outpatient counseling and managed care along with in-patient hospitalization for treatment of his alcohol abuse, as requested, prior to discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s documentation, summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...