Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100297

Original file (MD1100297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20101116

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050824 - 20051211     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20051212     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20091211      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 00 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 71
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 4.4 (12) / 4 . 4 (12) Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle SSDR (2) (2) MM CoC

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:
- 2009031 7 :       Article 112a (Wrongful possession of a controlled substance, steroids, D-bol, clembuterol, and
                  stanozolol , Camp Beuhring Kuwait, 20090201 )
         Awarded: RIR (to E-3) FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: FOP RESTR EPD (suspend ½ for 6 months)

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Applicant contends his End of Active Service (EAS) discharge was inequitable based on his service record and proficiency and conduct average.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 09 26 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . The Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any 6105 retention counseling warnings, but did reflect one for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance, steroids, on 1 Feb 2009, Camp Buehring , Kuwait ) . The records also revealed the A pplicant had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana a n undetermined number of times prior to entering the Marine Corps, and acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 23 Aug 2005 . Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, his command chose not to refer him to trial by co urt-martial, but opted instead for commanding officer nonjudicial punishment (NJP). Additionally, the command chose not to process him for administrative separation , which is mandatory per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPSMAN) for violation of UCMJ Article 112a . Normally, administrative separations from the Marine Corps for illegal dr ug use/drug abuse result in an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. The Applicant however, was allowed to reach his end of active obligated service and was discharged on 11 Dec 2009 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his EAS discharge was inequitable based on his service record and proficiency and conduct average. Standards of performance and conduct as determined by MCO P1610.7 series ( Performance Evaluation System ) , MCO P1070.12 series ( Individual Records Administration Manual), and customs of the service form the primary basis for determining characterization of service. However, for separations conducted at the completion of required active service, the only factor u s ed in determining the characterization of service is the proficiency and conduct mark average. Minimum acceptable proficiency and conduct averages for an Honorable disc harge are 3.0 and 4.0 , respectively. The Applicant ’s service record revealed a 4.4/4.4 proficiency and conduct mark average over 12 occasions. Accordingly , and with no evidence to the contrary, the Board determined the Applicant’s discharge to be proper, but the characterization of service to be inequitable. Relief warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries , and the completion of the required active service separation process, the Board found the discharge was proper but inequitable. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801827

Original file (MD0801827.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization as determined by the Commanding General was appropriate and an upgrade founded on the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate. Although the Applicant does not explicitly state this in his Application, the NDRB conducted a review based on this presumption. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001146

Original file (MD1001146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Decisional issues: The Applicant contends that he warranted an Honorable characterization of service at discharge vice the General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge characterization that he received if his proficiency and conduct marks were corrected administratively. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service and his service and medical record entries, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500256

Original file (MD1500256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included no 6105 counseling warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002279

Original file (MD1002279.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation was mandatory per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN).The Applicant’s reserve unit attempted to notify him of administrative separation processinginperson (5 Nov 94) and via mail (4 Dec 94) using the procedure. The Applicant’s misconduct dictated that he receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge at the time of his separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902244

Original file (MD0902244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation:From Congress member:Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902464

Original file (MD0902464.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20001030 - 20010813Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20010814Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20051202Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)19 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:49MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801414

Original file (MD0801414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), failure to maintain grooming standards Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002104

Original file (MD1002104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s overall proficiency and conduct (Pro/Con) marks of 4.2 and 3.9, respectively, he was discharged from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon completion of his required active service. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.The NDRB has no authority...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900806

Original file (MD0900806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200676

Original file (MD1200676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issues: The Applicant contends that his discharge action was inequitable: He left active duty with an Honorable discharge after four years of honest and faithful service - to include overseas service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom - only to receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge notification, three years later, for failing to keep the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100297

Similar Decisions