Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001806
Original file (ND1001806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-DCFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100708
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20011218 - 20020 6 0 3     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020604     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20051213      Highest Rank/Rate: DCFN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 10 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 37
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.75

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:

-200 3 1114:      Article (Insubordinate conduct toward a petty officer)
         Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation)
         Article 128 (Assault)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20051107 :      Article (Drugs – Marijuana 98 ng/ml)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20031114 :        For misconduct resulting in NJP

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON (2), MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL ”
         
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until
1 June 2008, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Applicant wants discharge upgraded so he can rec eive long - term treatment for his Post - Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) at a VA clinic.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0915             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and non-judicial punishments for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Insubordinate conduct toward a petty officer , ), Article ( Failure to obey order or regulation , ), A rticle ( Assault , ) , and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance, 1 specification) . The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel, submit a written statement , and request an administrative board .

: (Non-decisional) The Applicant wants his discharge upgraded so he can receive long - term treatment for his PTSD at a VA clinic. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of obtaining v eterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing a former service member’s eligibility to receive medical benefits. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant submitted a letter from his mother alleging he suffer s from PTSD due to his service in Iraq. Documentation found in the Applicant’s service and medical records, including the Post - Deployment Health Assessment he completed after his return from the Persian Gulf, indicates he did not experience any conditions that would render him at risk for PTSD. He was at sea and never directly engaged in combat operations in Iraq. T he Board also found no documentation in his m edical record s indicating he was having any mental problems or was ever diagnosed with PTSD. In addition, t he Board reviewed the documentation submitted by the Applicant indicating he was diagnosed with schizophrenia several years after being discharged from the Navy. Due to the amount of time that had elapsed between the Applicant’s discharge from the Navy and his diagnosis with schizophrenia, the NDRB could not determine with any level of c ertainty that the Applicant had the condition while in the Navy. As a result, the NDRB could not determine if the Applicant’s schizophrenia mitigated any of his misconduct that resulted in his proper and equitable discharge from the Navy. T he NDRB presumed regularity in that all matters pertaining to the Applicant’s mental health were conducted properly and accurately. The Applicant’s docu mentation was not suffic ient to rebut this presumption.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, medical and service r ecord e ntries , and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for more information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102075

    Original file (ND1102075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits.2. The Applicant deployed in support of Operation Noble Eagle.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700911

    Original file (ND0700911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ MILPERSMAN 1910-122 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. ” Additional Reviews :...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902305

    Original file (ND0902305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.Issue 2: (Decisional) () . However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401341 (8)

    Original file (ND1401341 (8).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends that he was denied his due process rights.2. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401341

    Original file (ND1401341.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends that he was denied his due process rights.2. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800265

    Original file (ND0800265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Administrative errors by her command delayed her request for shore duty and therefore was processed for Hardship Decision Date: 20080306Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HARDSHIP.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700960

    Original file (ND0700960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 20060421 (VIA CERTIFIED MAIL)Reason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Received Notification:20060501 (VIA CERTIFIED MAIL) Rights Elected at Notification: NO ELECTION FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20070615) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM (20070706)Reason for discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20070706 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301026

    Original file (ND1301026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800575

    Original file (ND0800575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision Date: 20080501Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE).Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900292

    Original file (MD0900292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Without further documentary evidence, the NDRB cannot form a basis of relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews :...